Acceleration due to gravity problem.Help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the acceleration due to gravity on the planet Mercury, given its mass and diameter. The original poster attempts to apply the gravitational formula using the planet's mass and radius, converting units as necessary.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion of diameter to radius and the necessary unit changes from kilometers to meters. There is a focus on the application of the gravitational formula and the interpretation of the result for acceleration due to gravity.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide positive feedback on the original poster's approach, while also questioning the final notation of "g" in the result. There is an exploration of density assumptions related to Mercury and a comparison to Earth's gravity, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of unit conversion and the implications of density assumptions in calculating gravitational acceleration. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in the final result notation.

NewtonJR.215
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Determine the acceleration due to gravity on the planet Mercury which has a mass of 3.30*10^23kg and a diameter of 4878 km.



Homework Equations


Gmp/rp2
Mp is mass of planet
Rp is radius of planet



The Attempt at a Solution


First off I needed to change the diameter into the radius. In my class I have to convert km to m.

4878 km*1000= 4,878,000 m

4,878,000/2= 2,439,000

2,439,000 is the radius

Next, plugged in.

G=6.67*10^-11

Gmp/rp2
(6.67*10^-11)(3.30*10^23)/2,439,000^2 = 3.70 g on Mercury.


I'm pretty sure this is correct just want to make sure. Thanks for looking it over!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

NewtonJR.215 said:
Gmp/rp2
(6.67*10^-11)(3.30*10^23)/2,439,000^2 = 3.70 g on Mercury.


I'm pretty sure this is correct just want to make sure. Thanks for looking it over!

Hi NewtonJR! Welcome to PF! :smile:

That's a very well-laid out solution … I can see exactly what you're doing!

Yes, that's fine … except I think you don't mean that "g" at the end, do you? :smile:

btw, as a check (which is often useful to make sure we're not 1000 out!), if we assume that Mercury's density is roughly the same as the Earth's, then mass is proportional to r³, so surface gravity is proportional to r, so should be about 40% of g, = about 4. Yippee! :biggrin:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi NewtonJR! Welcome to PF! :smile:

That's a very well-laid out solution … I can see exactly what you're doing!

Yes, that's fine … except I think you don't mean that "g" at the end, do you? :smile:

btw, as a check (which is often useful to make sure we're not 1000 out!), if we assume that Mercury's density is roughly the same as the Earth's, then mass is proportional to r³, so surface gravity is proportional to r, so should be about 40% of g, = about 4. Yippee! :biggrin:


Thanks for the welcome! Thanks for the feedback also. No, I didn't mean to put that "g" at the end.:cool:
 
This problem is SOLVED.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K