Acceleration due to gravity problem.Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration due to gravity on Mercury, given its mass of 3.30 x 10^23 kg and a diameter of 4878 km. The user correctly converts the diameter to radius in meters and applies the formula Gmp/rp², using the gravitational constant G = 6.67 x 10^-11. The calculated acceleration due to gravity is approximately 3.70 g, which is confirmed by another participant who appreciates the clarity of the solution. Additionally, a rough check suggests that the expected gravity should be about 40% of Earth's gravity, aligning with the calculated value. The problem is ultimately deemed solved.
NewtonJR.215
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Determine the acceleration due to gravity on the planet Mercury which has a mass of 3.30*10^23kg and a diameter of 4878 km.



Homework Equations


Gmp/rp2
Mp is mass of planet
Rp is radius of planet



The Attempt at a Solution


First off I needed to change the diameter into the radius. In my class I have to convert km to m.

4878 km*1000= 4,878,000 m

4,878,000/2= 2,439,000

2,439,000 is the radius

Next, plugged in.

G=6.67*10^-11

Gmp/rp2
(6.67*10^-11)(3.30*10^23)/2,439,000^2 = 3.70 g on Mercury.


I'm pretty sure this is correct just want to make sure. Thanks for looking it over!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

NewtonJR.215 said:
Gmp/rp2
(6.67*10^-11)(3.30*10^23)/2,439,000^2 = 3.70 g on Mercury.


I'm pretty sure this is correct just want to make sure. Thanks for looking it over!

Hi NewtonJR! Welcome to PF! :smile:

That's a very well-laid out solution … I can see exactly what you're doing!

Yes, that's fine … except I think you don't mean that "g" at the end, do you? :smile:

btw, as a check (which is often useful to make sure we're not 1000 out!), if we assume that Mercury's density is roughly the same as the Earth's, then mass is proportional to r³, so surface gravity is proportional to r, so should be about 40% of g, = about 4. Yippee! :biggrin:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi NewtonJR! Welcome to PF! :smile:

That's a very well-laid out solution … I can see exactly what you're doing!

Yes, that's fine … except I think you don't mean that "g" at the end, do you? :smile:

btw, as a check (which is often useful to make sure we're not 1000 out!), if we assume that Mercury's density is roughly the same as the Earth's, then mass is proportional to r³, so surface gravity is proportional to r, so should be about 40% of g, = about 4. Yippee! :biggrin:


Thanks for the welcome! Thanks for the feedback also. No, I didn't mean to put that "g" at the end.:cool:
 
This problem is SOLVED.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top