Acceleration given distance from earth (r)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration due to gravity at a specific distance from Earth for a satellite in orbit. The initial calculation yielded an acceleration of 0.31 m/s², which was confirmed as correct when using the gravitational formula, including the gravitational constant G. Participants clarified that the term "g" typically refers to Earth's surface gravity, suggesting the use of "a" for acceleration in orbit. The formula derived from Newton's law of gravitation was provided, showing that mass cancels out, leading to the final acceleration equation. The user plans to verify the answer with their professor due to issues with the online system not marking it correct.
Pajarito
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Question: Satellites are placed in a circular orbit that is 3.59 X 107 m above the surface of the earth. What is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity at this distance?

So far I've been using g=(M/r2) and get .31m/s2. There must be something wrong with either using this equation or that g isn't the acceleration. Can you explain how to reach acceleration from this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the equation you posted, you're missing the gravitational constant "G." However, I suspect you used it in your calculation because I got the same answer when I included G. You seem to be assuming that your answer of .31 m/s2 is wrong, but it seems fine to me.

I wouldn't use small g to denote the acceleration in orbit though. Small g usually refers to the acceleration due to gravity on Earth's surface. Instead, you could call it "a" for acceleration.
 
Normally I'd use the traditional gravitational formula, but since I don't have a mass for the second object (satellite) I'm not sure if I can use it. F=(GM1M2)/r2. Since F=ma, I wonder if once I solve the equation I should divide it by the mass of Earth again to isolate a, that would lead to a very small number though and I don't think that would be accurate, any suggestions about doing it that way?
 
Pajarito said:
Normally I'd use the traditional gravitational formula, but since I don't have a mass for the second object (satellite) I'm not sure if I can use it. F=(GM1M2)/r2. Since F=ma, I wonder if once I solve the equation I should divide it by the mass of Earth again to isolate a, that would lead to a very small number though and I don't think that would be accurate, any suggestions about doing it that way?

Sure, you can use Newton's law of gravitation no problem. That's what the equation you used is derived from. Here's how:

\displaystyle F=G\frac{mM_E}{r^2}

\displaystyle a=F/m

Substitute F:

\displaystyle a=G\frac{mM_E}{r^2}/m

and m cancels to give:

\displaystyle a=G\frac{M_E}{r^2}

Then, plugging in the radius given by the problem, and putting in the numerical values for G and ME (mass of earth):

\displaystyle a=(6.673×10^{-11})\frac{5.972×10^{24} kg}{(3.59×10^7 m)^2} = 0.31\frac{m}{s^2}

Are you convinced that you got the right answer yet? :)
 
Last edited:
I'm convinced but it's this online system that won't mark the answer as correct, I'll check with my professor. Thanks for you help.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top