Acceleration Of Tennis Racket (Linear And Rotational Quantites)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total acceleration of a tennis racket during a serve, given its mass, angular acceleration, and angular speed. The key formula used is the combination of translational and centripetal acceleration, expressed as the square root of the sum of their squares. Participants clarify that the entire length of the racket should be used for calculations, rather than halving it, as the shoulder acts as the pivot point. The correct approach involves using the full distance of 1.4 m to find the centripetal acceleration, leading to the correct total acceleration calculation. Ultimately, the clarification about using the full length resolves the initial confusion and allows for accurate results.
Pat2666
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
PROBLEM

During a serve, a tennis racket of mass 1.6 kg is given an angular acceleration of 157 rad/sec2. At the top of the serve, the racket has an angular speed of 13 rad/sec.
If the distance between the top of the racket and the shoulder is 1.4 m, what is the total acceleration of the top of the racket?

atotal = ? m/sec2

Okay so I'm having some trouble here. I know that atotal is the combination of atranslational and acentripetal, well rather the addition of the squares of each equal to the square of atotal, but I'm not sure how to solve for atranslational.

I know that acp = rw^2 and I solved using the values given to get 118.3m/s^2.

However, when it comes to solving at = ra I don't know how to get the angular acceleration. I'm pretty sure the initial angular acceleration isn't what you use, as I got the wrong answer, but how else do I determine it at the top?

Any help would be appriciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pat2666 said:
I know that acp = rw^2 and I solved using the values given to get 118.3m/s^2.
How did you get this result?
However, when it comes to solving at = ra I don't know how to get the angular acceleration. I'm pretty sure the initial angular acceleration isn't what you use, as I got the wrong answer, but how else do I determine it at the top?
Lacking information to the contrary, I would assume that the angular acceleration is constant.
 
Doc Al said:
How did you get this result?

Lacking information to the contrary, I would assume that the angular acceleration is constant.

I got it by first finding the radius of the racket (1.4m / 2 = 0.7m) and then multiplying that by the square of the 13 rad/s angular speed at the top of the racket.

0.7m * 13 rad/s = 118.3 rad/s

Well if that were true, referring to the constant angular acceleration, then would I still be on the right track following the idea of a^2 + b^2 = c^2?
 
Pat2666 said:
I got it by first finding the radius of the racket (1.4m / 2 = 0.7m) and then multiplying that by the square of the 13 rad/s angular speed at the top of the racket.

0.7m * 13 rad/s = 118.3 rad/s
1.4m is the distance between shoulder and the tip of the racket. Assume that the shoulder is the axis about which the arm and racket swings. (No need to divide by 2.)
Well if that were true, referring to the constant angular acceleration, then would I still be on the right track following the idea of a^2 + b^2 = c^2?
Sure.
 
Doc Al said:
1.4m is the distance between shoulder and the tip of the racket. Assume that the shoulder is the axis about which the arm and racket swings. (No need to divide by 2.)

Sure.

Oh I see! So the entire racket creates the circle, not just the top part!

Thanks! I just plugged it in instead of 0.7 m and it came out correctly. Thanks so much :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top