Acceleration of Two Disks Welded Together

  • Thread starter Thread starter student34
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the downward acceleration of a block suspended from a string wrapped around a smaller disk welded to a larger disk. The initial attempt at the solution yielded an acceleration of 4.08 m/s², but the correct answer is 2.88 m/s². The error in the calculation stemmed from a misinterpretation of the radius of the larger disk, which was initially confused with a smaller value. The importance of accurate unit conversion is emphasized, particularly in determining the angular acceleration. The final clarification confirms that the radius of the larger disk is indeed 5.00 cm.
student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement



Two metal disks, one with radius R1 = 2.50 cm and mass M1 = 0.80 kg and the other with radius R2 = 5.00 cm and mass M2 = 1.60 kg, are welded together and mounted on a frictionless axis through their common center.

(a) A light string is wrapped around the edge of the smaller disk, and a 1.50 kg block is suspended from the free end of the string. What is the magnitude of the downward acceleration of the block after it has been released.

(I should add that there is a picture that looks like an axis going through a nickel and a dime stuck together, and there is a weight hanging from the string that is wrapped around the smaller disk.)

Homework Equations



τ = F*L = I(1)*α + I(2)*α, where L = radius, τ = torque and α = angular acceleration.

I = 0.5*M*R^2

a = α*L

The Attempt at a Solution



F*L = I(1)*α + I(2)*α

α = F*L/(I(1) + I(2))

α = (1.50kg *9.8*0.025m)/(0.5*0.8kg*(0.025m)^2 + 0.5*1.6kg*(0.05m)^2) = 163.333rad/s^2

a = α*L = (163.333rad/s^2)*0.025m = 4.08m/s^2

But the answer is 2.88m/s^2.

Can anyone see where I went wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to be careful converting your units. In determining the angular acceleration, you are using a value of 5 cm (0.05 m) for R2, which the OP states is 0.500 cm, or 0.005 m.
 
SteamKing said:
You have to be careful converting your units. In determining the angular acceleration, you are using a value of 5 cm (0.05 m) for R2, which the OP states is 0.500 cm, or 0.005 m.

Darn, it is suppose to be 5.00cm. I edited it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top