Acceleration Problem: Calculating Time Difference for Porsche vs. Honda 400 Race

  • Thread starter Thread starter rebeccc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
In a race between a Porsche with an acceleration of 3.5 and a Honda with an acceleration of 3.0, the Honda starts with a 50-meter head start. To calculate the time difference for the winner, the formula x = v_0t + 1/2 at^2 is recommended for both vehicles. The key unknown in this equation is time, which needs to be solved for each car to determine the winner. Previous attempts at calculating the time difference yielded various results, but the correct approach involves comparing the times derived from the formula. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately applying the physics formula to find the winning time difference.
rebeccc
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
A Porsche challenges a Honda to a 400 race. Because the Porsche's acceleration of 3.5 is larger than the Honda's 3.0 , the Honda gets a 50 head start. Assume, somewhat unrealistically, that both cars can maintain these accelerations the entire distance.

By how much time does the winner win?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried?
 
Pretty much everything I could think of. We have online homework and we have to submit the answer and we only have 6 attempts.. and I'm down to two. The answers I have submitted already are: 2.39, 1.5, .85, and .11
 
Well if you're using this formula:

x = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2

Then, you should get the right answer. The only unknown in that formula is the time, which is what you are after. Simply do that for both cars and compare their times.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top