Accepted value of G with longitude

  • Thread starter Thread starter B-80
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Longitude Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the accepted value of gravitational acceleration (g) at a specific longitude, with a focus on the correct interpretation of latitude versus longitude. The accepted value of g is noted to be approximately 9.7803267714 m/s², with clarification that longitude does not require adjustment in calculations, only latitude does. Participants emphasize the importance of significant figures in reporting measurements, suggesting that local geological variations can affect precision beyond the third decimal place. A calculation example illustrates how a minuscule change in g corresponds to a relatively small mass, highlighting the need for careful handling of significant figures in scientific contexts. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of measuring gravitational acceleration accurately.
B-80
Messages
73
Reaction score
1
Hey I have a lab write up due, and on it I need the accepted value of g and to get it at my longitude, any idea what this means, and how I can figure it out
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your longitude [by which, we'll pretend you actually said latitude]? Do you mean altitude, or do you have some experiment that can distinguish centripetal acceleration from gravitational acceleration (without being sensitive to geological variations specific to your location)?

I suggest "10ms^-2".
 
Last edited:
Here is a link:

http://geophysics.ou.edu/solid_earth/notes/potential/igf.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks man so its 9.7803267714 right? and then the other equation next to it with lambda is to fix for longitude?
 
No lambda is latititude, there is no theoretical reason to fix for longitidue.
Note that the equation is an avaerage over the earth, after about the 3rd decimal place the local geology has a larger effect, so you probably don't want to quote more sig figures.
 
Can someone knock up a quick example to show the OP how ridiculous the number of SF he has used there is?

What kind of mass corresponds to a 0.0000000001 m/s/s change in g? A pebble? A boulder?

It's something i'd be interested to know. And I think that it's important that the OP has it hammered home how carefully you have to handle SF.
 
Using Newton's equation of gravitation g = -(Gm) / r^2

G = Gravitational Constant r = Distance from centre of body g = "Force" due to gravity m = mass

Assuming the radius of the object is 1 meter

0.0000000001 = (6.67300 × 10 ^ -11 x mass) / ( 1 ^ 2)

Mass = 0.0000000001 / 6.67300 × 10 ^ -11

Mass = 1.4985763 kg

So yeah a large pebble...
 
Back
Top