Acidity of Isobutane: pKa Value & Kb Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter sciencegem
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Isobutane has a pKa value of 71, indicating it is an extremely weak acid. Calculating its Ka yields a value of 1e-71, leading to a Kb of 1e57, which raises concerns about its validity as a base. The discussion highlights the "leveling effect" in water, where very strong acids fully dissociate, making the pKa of weak acids like isobutane irrelevant in aqueous solutions. This phenomenon suggests that while pKa and pKb values can provide insights for organic reactions in different solvents, they may not be reliable in water. Overall, the calculations and concepts illustrate the complexities of acid-base behavior in various contexts.
sciencegem
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Don't want to give too many details, but a homework question gives a pKa value for isobutane (CH3)3CH as 71. I'm obviously missing something because when I try to calculate Kb out of curiosity I get an astoundingly large value (especially considering I don't even see how isobutane could be a base!).

Homework Equations



Ka = 10^(-pKa)

Kw = Ka * Kb

The Attempt at a Solution



The question has the isobutane in a relatively dilute (1e-3 M) solution. I calculated (using the equations above) Ka to be 1e-71, an extremely weak acid which makes sense to me, but then if I use that value in the second equation, I get Kb = Kw/Ka = 1e57. That can't be right! How would isobutane even function as a base, not to mention that's a ridiculously enormous value of Kb. What am I missing? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kw=Ka*Kb works for water solutions, and even then not for very weak and very strong acids.

Very strong acid will simply fully dissociate protonating water to H3O+ and H3O+ will be the only acid present - so it is the strongest possible acid in water solutions. This is called "leveling effect". Similarly, no base can be stronger than OH-. For a very weak acid (like isobutane) presence of a much stronger acid (water itself) means its pKa doesn't matter (in water solutions).

Such very high values of pKa/pKb can be used to predict what happens in organic chemistry, when substances react in other solvents in water. While they help give some qualitative predictions, this is quite handwavy.
 
  • Like
Likes sciencegem
Borek said:
Kw=Ka*Kb works for water solutions, and even then not for very weak and very strong acids.

Very strong acid will simply fully dissociate protonating water to H3O+ and H3O+ will be the only acid present - so it is the strongest possible acid in water solutions. This is called "leveling effect". Similarly, no base can be stronger than OH-. For a very weak acid (like isobutane) presence of a much stronger acid (water itself) means its pKa doesn't matter (in water solutions).

Such very high values of pKa/pKb can be used to predict what happens in organic chemistry, when substances react in other solvents in water. While they help give some qualitative predictions, this is quite handwavy.
Perfect. Thanks so much!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top