Acoustic doppler effect at subsonic, sonic and supersonic speeds

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the implications of the Doppler Effect at various speeds, particularly focusing on zero and negative periods for observers moving at sonic and supersonic speeds. A zero period occurs when a moving observer receives the same wave crest, while a negative period indicates a reversal in the order of wave crests. The conversation also touches on electromagnetic waves, suggesting that if they travel through a medium, similar effects to acoustic waves can occur. However, in a vacuum, no observer can exceed the speed of light, aligning with Einstein's theories. The complexities of wave behavior at these speeds highlight fundamental principles of physics.
bernhard.rothenstein
Messages
991
Reaction score
1
Defining the period measured by a moving observer relative to a stationary source as
T=t(n)-t(n-1) where t(n) and t(n-1) represent the times when two successive wavecrests are received respectively, the theory of the Doppler Effect leads zero and negative periods in the case of sonic and supersonic motions of the observer. . Do you consider that a zero period is associated with the fact that the moving observer receives one and the same wave crest, a negative period being associated with a reversal in the order in which the wave crests are received.
Thanks for your answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you consider that a zero period is associated with the fact that the moving observer receives one and the same wave crest
Yes, like you were surfing the wave.

negative period being associated with a reversal in the order in which the wave crests are received.
Yes, if you move faster than the waves.

What would happen if the wave was Electro-Magnetic and you move at c ?
I know that Einstein thougt about it, when he was a child, but I don't know the answer.
 
alvaros said:
Yes, like you were surfing the wave.


Yes, if you move faster than the waves.

What would happen if the wave was Electro-Magnetic and you move at c ?
I know that Einstein thougt about it, when he was a child, but I don't know the answer.
Thanks. There is a situation when the e.m wave moves through a medium with u<c. In that case we can have the situations "luminal" and "superluminal" with simillar results as in the case of an acoustic wave.
But if the e.m. wave propagates through empty space then nobody can move with v>c and so Einstein's dream is not feasible.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top