Acoustic power of loudspeakers and interference

adrian116
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
the problems is that:
two loudspeakers, A and B, radiate sound uniformly in all directions in air at 20 degree C. The acoustic power output from A is 8x10^-4 W, and from B it is 6x10^-5 W. Both loudspeakers are vibrating in phase at a frequency of 172 Hz.

a) Determine the difference in phase of the two signals at a point C along the line joining A and B, 3m from B and 4m from A.

b) Determine the intensity and sound intensity level at C from speaker A if speaker B is turned off and the intensity and sound intensity level at point C from speaker B if speaker A is turned off.

c) With both speakers on, what are the intensity and sound intensity level at C?

In part a, i have tried to work out the y(x,t)=Acos(kx-wt) of both loudspeakers, then add them together, I have got the result 2A,
but their phase difference is pi (3.14).

In part b, i have no idea how to link the power and intensity together.

thanks for attention.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
adrian116 said:
the problems is that:
two loudspeakers, A and B, radiate sound uniformly in all directions in air at 20 degree C. The acoustic power output from A is 8x10^-4 W, and from B it is 6x10^-5 W. Both loudspeakers are vibrating in phase at a frequency of 172 Hz.

a) Determine the difference in phase of the two signals at a point C along the line joining A and B, 3m from B and 4m from A.

There are several way to express this, but one possible way is the following: the phas difefrence at a given point (for two sources in phase) is simply the difference of distance to the two sources divided by the wavelength, all this multiplied by two pi, {2 \pi (r_2 -r_1) \over \lambda} (where r_2 is the distance between the point and the farthest of the two sources). This makes sense, right? For example, if the point is equidistant to the two sources, the two waves are in phase at that point. If the point is at a distance \lambda farher from one source than the other, there will be a difference of phase of 2 pi radians, etc.
b) Determine the intensity and sound intensity level at C from speaker A if speaker B is turned off and the intensity and sound intensity level at point C from speaker B if speaker A is turned off.

c) With both speakers on, what are the intensity and sound intensity level at C?

In part a, i have tried to work out the y(x,t)=Acos(kx-wt) of both loudspeakers, then add them together, I have got the result 2A,
but their phase difference is pi (3.14).

In part b, i have no idea how to link the power and intensity together.

thanks for attention.
The intensity (in Watt per meter squared) is I = { P \over 4 \pi r^2} where r is the distance between the point and the source and P is the power (in watts) of the source). As for the sound intensity level, it is \beta = 10 log {I \over 10^{-12} W/m^2}. Notice that is is a log, not an ln. And it comes out in decibels.

when the two sources ar on (assuming that they are incoherent), you must add the *intensities* of the two at the given point *before* calculating the sound level.

Hope this helps.

PAtrick
 
thx for your helping,
i will try my best to understand it
 
i got a problem that how do you derive the equation of
intensity of sound I = { P \over 4 \pi r^2} ?
 
and the answer in part c is wrong if i add the intensities at a particular point together....
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top