Activation Energy: Dependence Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter garytse86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Activation Energy
AI Thread Summary
Activation energy (Ea) is generally considered to be independent of temperature, despite its apparent dependence in the Arrhenius equation. The equation can be rearranged to show that while the rate constant (k) changes with temperature, the activation energy remains constant. This is supported by classical chemistry experiments where plotting ln(k) against 1/T yields a straight line, allowing for the calculation of Ea using the slope, which is equal to Ea/R. Thus, while k varies with temperature, Ea does not.
garytse86
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
Is activation energy dependent?

I think it isn't, but if you rearrange the Arrhenius equation you get:
Ea - activation energy
Ea = RT(lnA - lnk)
so as temperature Ea can change. But I am thinking that k will also change in relation so Ea is constant?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Ea is temp. independent, K will change with a change in T. So if T changes the -lnK factor will change so Ea will always be constant. A classical chemistry experiment at universities is plotting lnK vs. 1/T. The rate of the reaction at different temperatures is recorded in the lab. From the straight line in plot of lnk vs 1/T you can calculate the slope and the slope is equal to Ea/R.
 
ok thanks very much.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top