Addiator: Short introduction about a calculator from the 60s

  • #1
Summary: A short introduction to a antique calculator that I recently got

I first know about this thing when I was chatting with @jedishrfu a couple months ago, and I was fascinated by it. It functions like a soroban but looks way cooler and easier to carry around. Also, it is a important calculation tool before digital calculators exist.

So, I finally decided to buy one:
8007269E-4E11-4805-ABF2-B1896B7621EB.jpeg


0D1FE484-92C9-4980-B803-38BA9DCAE65C.jpeg
It works by sliding the middle bars with a stylo(the pen like thing) thus showing numbers from the center hole. It uses a clever mechanism to carry the digits from one row to another: You slide the stylo over the hook shape grove on top of every row and push the next row by a single digit.

Because mine is not in top condition and the sliding is quite stiff, but it is still functional and still amazes me. Although it's function has long been replaced by digital calculators, it's still a important artifact in the math history.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, ali PMPAINT, Borek and 4 others

Answers and Replies

  • #2
14,171
8,149
What else is cool is that there are very few moving parts and the only user failure mode is to not follow through during the carry at the top vs all the myriad ways circuits can fail in a calculator.

This is a great piece of nostalgia from a simpler time free of computers.

Thanks for sharing.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, fresh_42 and YoungPhysicist
  • #4
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2022 Award
17,643
18,304
What else is cool is that there are very few moving parts and the only user failure mode is to not follow through during the carry at the top vs all the myriad ways circuits can fail in a calculator.

This is a great piece of nostalgia from a simpler time free of computers.

Thanks for sharing.
There is one bad thing about it. I do remember those. 😭😭😭
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes nuuskur, YoungPhysicist, anorlunda and 2 others
  • #6
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2022 Award
17,643
18,304
What was bad about them other than you couldn't use them in school?
Let me put it this way.

Once on a warm summer evening after work, I stood in a cocktail bar with someone about my age. It was a time in the 90s when they covered many old songs from the 70s. To most people they were new, but of course my neighbor and I could sing along all of them, which we did in a way (for us, not for the entire bar). Suddenly he poked me and said: "You have to be cautious nowadays what you sing." Still caught in the old tune I asked why. "Well," he answered, "it tells how old you are."
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist, DaveE, jedishrfu and 1 other person
  • #7
DaveC426913
Gold Member
21,358
4,818
Had one of these in my childhood.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist and jedishrfu
  • #8
14,171
8,149
Just tell them you're older than dirt and they will be impressed at how young you look.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist
  • #9
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
11,184
8,577
Ah yes, I remember them too. That dates me.

Even more fun from that era, was this calculator from Curta. You could hold it above your head and swing it around in circles to "crank out the answer."

1563991749368.png


It was my belief that Facit made a hand calculator similar to the Curta and that was the origin of the idiom in Swedish. For example, "Med facit i handen skulle vi ha gjort annorlunda" meaning "In retrospect, we would have done it differently."
But I can't find any supporting evidence for that. Perhaps @mfb or @Doc Al can set me straight.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu, YoungPhysicist, Doc Al and 1 other person
  • #10
Doc Al
Mentor
45,461
1,948
Don't look at me! That's some pretty cool stuff, but I don't know anything about it. (Though I admit to being ancient. :cool:) The only "mechanical" calculator I've used was my trusty slide rule, replaced by my shiny new TI SR calculator (SR 10/11, I think).
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and YoungPhysicist
  • #11
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2022 Award
17,643
18,304
The slide rule had a big, big advantage, which I sometimes have the feeling got lost: You had to do a separate calculation for the magnitude of the solution! I wished kids nowadays would also had to do it.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213, jedishrfu, Klystron and 2 others
  • #12
DaveE
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,818
2,470
The slide rule had a big, big advantage, which I sometimes have the feeling got lost: You had to do a separate calculation for the magnitude of the solution! I wished kids nowadays would also had to do it.
Absolutely! It also taught you the real meaning of significant digits. I'm not sure how many people today realize that π = 3.14 is really good enough, almost always. For accuracy π = 3.1416. More digits than that usually just demonstrates your ignorance of engineering.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu, Klystron, YoungPhysicist and 1 other person
  • #13
DaveC426913
Gold Member
21,358
4,818
I am a hair too young for slide rules. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • #14
Hmm, it appears that I am the only one in this thread that don’t have stories from the past... Not surprising. :-p

When I was born, digital calculators had took over for a while, and the only mechanical calculator that is still lurking around is soroban(which I think will still be lurking around for years to come).

This just shows how young I am.:cool:
 
  • #15
Klystron
Gold Member
1,047
1,572
The slide rule had a big, big advantage, which I sometimes have the feeling got lost: You had to do a separate calculation for the magnitude of the solution! I wished kids nowadays would also had to do it.
Absolutely! It also taught you the real meaning of significant digits. I'm not sure how many people today realize that π = 3.14 is really good enough, almost always. For accuracy π = 3.1416. More digits than that usually just demonstrates your ignorance of engineering.
I am just old enough to have learned how to use a slide rule as a child. The coolest thing for me along with the above was learning logarithms. I was so young I created my own names. I called the base of natural logarithms "Eee" and the inverse function "Lenny".

Seldom used my slide rule for calculation. If I could not figure it in my head, my mother the librarian had an electro-mechanical calculator that printed on a paper strip.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre, fresh_42 and jedishrfu
  • #16
14,171
8,149
As i read the electro mechanical part, I imagined your mom was going to apply electroshock therapy on your head aka tiger mom.

Shades of A Beautiful Mind
 
  • #17
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2022 Award
17,643
18,304
I called the base of natural logarithms "Eee" and the inverse function "Lenny".
I had a similar thing going on with logarithms. I observed that addition ##\longrightarrow## multiplication ##\longrightarrow## powers ##\longrightarrow## etc. built natural extensions. So I thought about a binary operation ##\circ ## such that there is another one on the left end of the chain ##\log (a+b)= \log a \circ \log b##. My only condition was, that ##2 \circ 2 = 4## must hold, since ##2+2=2\cdot 2= 2^2 = 4##.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and Klystron
  • #18
14,171
8,149
For the exponents part, I developed a simple rule ie add the factor exponents on a multiplication and if the right index was used to point to a factor add 1 to the exponents.

I usually wrote my numbers in scientific notation too.

The funny part was while it sped my calculations along my teacher didn’t like the rule. He wanted kids to “realize” the answer needed a factor of ten as in knowing that 3 x 4 is 12 and not 1.2

Whereas I would say 3E0 x 4E0 is 1.2E0 but then added one to get 1.2E1 or 12 because i used the right index on the C scale.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and fresh_42
  • #20
14,171
8,149
Woth respect to PI, many sliderules had a special mark on the scale that was a bit more accurate than using 3.14. Similarly for the mysterious e number and for r radians.

Also some rules had a separate C prime and or D prime scale which had pi factored in saving one multiplication step.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213 and Klystron
  • #21
14,171
8,149
With respect to the addiator, I wondered if using it in combination with Trachtenberg rules of multiplication allowed it to effectively do multiplications quickly. The one problem with Trachtenberg was the need to keep multiple rules in play as you processed a multi digit calculation like 3141592 x 271834 which some kids could do on a blackboard in one line at blinding speed.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist
  • #22
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2022 Award
17,643
18,304
Woth respect to PI, many sliderules had a special mark on the scale that was a bit more accurate than using 3.14. Similarly for the mysterious e number and for r radians.
:devil: You made me fetch that darn thing!

Mine has 11 scales on each side. Unbelievable! And meanwhile I have another problem: Some of those scales are so tiny ... and my eyesight meanwhile ... But, it still works! I'm not sure similar can be said about electronic devices after so many years.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist, Klystron and jedishrfu
  • #23
With respect to the addiator, I wondered if using it in combination with Trachtenberg rules of multiplication allowed it to effectively do multiplications quickly. The one problem with Trachtenberg was the need to keep multiple rules in play as you processed a multi digit calculation like 3141592 x 271834 which some kids could do on a blackboard in one line at blinding speed.
Probably, but a good hardware is essential... :woot:
 
  • #24
14,171
8,149
You can always apply a steampunk solution using a magnifying lens attached to the sliderule ala the Brazil movie computer terminal scene.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and BillTre
  • #25
gmax137
Science Advisor
2,276
1,918
search u-tube for "addiator" -- there are a few nice short videos demonstrating use.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist and jedishrfu
  • #26
gmax137
Science Advisor
2,276
1,918
Even more fun from that era, was this calculator from Curta.
I thought, that Curta looks cool! I need one of those. Check ebay... Wow. Nobody is giving those away, the lowest priced one I saw was over $600 US. Most are over $1500. I will never own one, unless I stumble over someone selling "granpa's old office stuff" at a garage sale.
 
  • #27
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2022 Award
17,643
18,304
I thought, that Curta looks cool! I need one of those. Check ebay... Wow. Nobody is giving those away, the lowest priced one I saw was over $600 US. Most are over $1500. I will never own one, unless I stumble over someone selling "granpa's old office stuff" at a garage sale.
The prices in Europe are similar: 1,200€ to 1,700€. The cheapest one was 1,200 CHF - and sold. But I found a poster for 16€ on amazon ;-)
 
  • #28
14,171
8,149
What would be neat is a new kind of Curta Model 3.141592...0 where the innards are replaced with a Raspberry PI Zero, some specialty python code, some specialty sliders for input, a crank for charging the battery and some mechanics for proper number display.
 
  • #29
Klystron
Gold Member
1,047
1,572
What would be neat is a new kind of Curta Model 3.141592...0 where the innards are replaced with a Raspberry PI Zero, some specialty python code, some specialty sliders for input, a crank for charging the battery and some mechanics for proper number display.
Replace the crank with a chirpy whistle and project a holographic display, you may have recreated R2D2.
1564078200641.png
 
  • #30
Klystron
Gold Member
1,047
1,572
I have only seen Curta calculators in technology museums.

The mechanical calculators in the original post were inexpensive enough that my grandfather gave each child in my family their own as a souvenir. The stylus was soon lost but easy to improvise.

I forget the Cantonese term for abacus, but they seemed as common as cash registers around San Francisco. M'Goy.
 
  • #31
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2022 Award
17,643
18,304
I forget the Cantonese term for abacus, but they seemed as common as cash registers around San Francisco. M'Goy.
Abacuses are the natural enemy of the IRS.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Klystron, YoungPhysicist and anorlunda
  • #32
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
11,184
8,577
What would be neat is a new kind of Curta Model 3.141592...0 where the innards are replaced with a Raspberry PI Zero, some specialty python code, some specialty sliders for input, a crank for charging the battery and some mechanics for proper number display.
Wow that would be fun. Imagine the looks you would get in the final exam room when you lift it over your head and start spinning it in the air.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and YoungPhysicist
  • #34
cobalt124
61
32
Had one of these in my childhood.
My Dad bought me a similar type one when I was a kid. I already had an electronic calculator but I was fascinated with a mechanical device for adding and subtracting. Lost the stylus at some point so ended up using a four inch nail.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist, Klystron and jedishrfu

Suggested for: Addiator: Short introduction about a calculator from the 60s

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
325
Replies
2
Views
188
Replies
3
Views
455
Replies
63
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
640
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
172
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
514
Top