Adding a mass on an oscillation causing a change in frequency

AI Thread Summary
Attaching a mass to the end of a suspended rod decreases its oscillation frequency. The discussion centers around the relationship between mass and frequency in oscillatory systems, specifically pendulums. It is clarified that the frequency equation for a pendulum does not include mass as a variable, indicating that the frequency is independent of mass. The confusion arises from the impact of added mass on the system's moment of inertia and the resulting changes in the period of oscillation. Ultimately, the increase in mass leads to a longer period, thus decreasing the frequency of oscillation.
kavipach
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin uniform rod of mass m is suspended from one end and oscillates with a frequency f.
If a small sphere of mass 2m is attached to the other end, does the frequency increase or decrease?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have reached a conclusion that the frequency would decrease but I am not sure exactly why. Is it because the amplitude would become bigger?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it's not because of the amplitude.

Is this talking about a pendulum? What do you know about pendulums? Any formulas?
 
i know that pendulums work due to the concervation of energy but i don't understand how this could be about a pendulum.
 
Unless the P.E becomes greater when mass and since P.E=K.E, K.E becomes greater. But i don't understand how this would change the frequency.
 
kavipach said:
Unless the P.E becomes greater when mass and since P.E=K.E, K.E becomes greater. But i don't understand how this would change the frequency.

What can you say about the period of a pendulum?
 
kavipach: What is the equation for frequency of a pendulum?

If you look closely, there are only two variables in that equation. Is mass one of them?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top