Adding sines and cosines tip to tail

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbigras
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To express z = 2 sin(ωt) + 3 cos(ωt) in the form z = Re[Ae^(j(ωt + α))], the terms can be treated as vectors added tip to tail. The conversion involves recognizing that sine and cosine functions are phase-shifted versions of each other, specifically, sine is cosine shifted by -π/2. The process of adding these terms as phasors is valid because they share the same frequency, allowing for the combination of their amplitudes and phases. Understanding this vector representation clarifies how to manipulate the sine and cosine terms effectively. This approach simplifies the analysis of oscillatory functions in engineering and physics contexts.
mbigras
Messages
61
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Express the following in the form z = Re[Ae^{j(\omega t+ \alpha)}]
<br /> z = 2 \sin(\omega t) + 3 \cos(\omega t)<br />

Homework Equations


<br /> e^{j \theta} = \cos(\theta) + j\sin(\theta)<br />


The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> z = 2 \sin(\omega t) + 3 \cos(\omega t) \\<br /> z = 2 \cos(\omega t - \pi/2) + 3 \cos(\omega t) \\<br />
I'm looking at my professors notes for this question. He is then able to add these terms together like vectors, tip to tail (see attached image). I'm pretty sure this works because he's using the real parts, although I don't see the general mechanics of how to treat these cosine terms like vectors. Especially how he seems to be ignoring the \omega t and only using the -\pi/2 and 0 when choosing the angles that the vectors shoot out. I'd like some explanation for why his process works.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2013-10-12 21:02:21.png
    Screenshot from 2013-10-12 21:02:21.png
    21.8 KB · Views: 359
Physics news on Phys.org
He's adding phasors - yes.
sine and cosine are the same vector rotated by 90deg.
But it only works like that if they have the same frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top