Adding Spheres: How to find the new radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Goatsenator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Spheres
AI Thread Summary
When adding together eight identical spheres, the new radius can be calculated using volume, which is additive. The volume of the combined spheres equals (4/3)π(R)^3 for the new radius R, leading to the conclusion that R is twice the radius of an individual sphere. However, surface area is not additive; when calculating surface area, the new radius results in R*2*√(2) due to the loss of surface area where the spheres merge. This discrepancy arises because while volume increases proportionally with mass conservation, surface area does not grow at the same rate. Understanding this difference clarifies the calculations for combining spheres.
Goatsenator
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Okay this seems like a really simple question. Basically I'm adding together 8 spheres (like raindrops coalescing into one bigger drop) and I'm getting two different answers for the new radius.

Each individual drop is identical.

I start by expressing the new volume in terms of the individual drops' radii, and then the new radius. The individual drops' radii are R.


Volume = (4/3)∏(R)^3 * 8 = (4/3)pi(Rf)^3

I work it all out and find that the new radius is 2 times the radius of an individual drop. This is true according to a solution given.

But when I try this with surface area...

S.A. = 4∏(R)^2 * 8 = 4∏(Rf)^2

4∏ cancels,
then the new radius comes out as R*2*√(2)

What am I missing here? Is Surface area not additive, or am I making some calculation error?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Surface area is not additive. Imagine if you took two rectangular prisms and joined them together at a common side: each rectangular prism has lost a side to the interior of the combined object, so the surface area is NOT double the surface area of an individual block. The case with the spheres is similar. The volume should be additive, however. The reason is that, thinking physically, the mass of all the spheres is conserved, so unless the density were to change during the process of joining the droplets together, the volume increases by the same factor as the increase in mass.
 
Last edited:
Oh, okay that makes sense. How did I make it this far? lol Thanks for the help!
 
Two raindrops, each of radius r, have volume (4/3)\pi r^3 each. If they "coalesce", because mass is conserved, and the density of water is a constant, the volume will be (8/3)\pi r^3. Solve (4/3)\pi R^3= (8/3)\pi r^3 for the new radius, R.
 
Surface area doesn't grow proportionately to volume, hence Bergmann's rule.
 
Volume is additive. Add the volumes and derive the radius.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top