Adding Up Resistors: Order of Operations Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter prettykitty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the correct method for calculating equivalent resistance in a circuit involving a 13-ohm and a 24-ohm resistor. The initial mistake was assuming the 13-ohm and 24-ohm resistors were in parallel, which is incorrect as they do not share common nodes. Instead, the top resistor and the 13-ohm resistor should be treated as being in series, and their equivalent resistance should be calculated first. After obtaining this value, the 24-ohm resistor can then be added using the appropriate formula for parallel resistors. Understanding the definitions of series and parallel connections is crucial for accurate circuit analysis.
prettykitty
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have added an attachment of the circuit for clarity.

I initially began by assuming that the 13 ohm and 24 ohm resistors were in parallel and I got the Req for them. Then since the top resistor seemed to be in series with them I added its value. This is wrong of course, the correct sequence of steps is:

Treat the top resistor and the 13 ohm resistor as as if they are in series. Then with the attained Req add the 24 ohm resistor using the correct math for parallel resistors.

Where did my thinking originally go wrong?
My guess is that it has something to do with some sort of "order of operations" for circuits. Can that be clarified please?
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 443
Physics news on Phys.org
The 13-ohm and 24-ohm are simply, definitionally, not in parallel.
 
Yes great, I knew that already.
Can you be a little more helpful and explain why?
Statements of fact are of little help.
 
Sorry, I was just pointing out where your thinking originally went wrong:wink:.

By definitionally, I mean that thinking that the resistors (13 and 24-ohm) are in parallel violates the definition of "in parallel", which is: two elements are considered "in parallel" if they share common starting and ending nodes, which those two elements do not.

The top resistor and the 13-ohm are definitionally "in series" (connected end-to-end with no branching node in between).
 
Hey no problem, thanks a bunch!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top