Advantages of Trunnion Pipe Supports

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ask1122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pipe
AI Thread Summary
Trunnion pipe supports are advantageous because they prevent pipe movement in all directions while allowing for some rotational freedom, which avoids over-constraining the system. Unlike anchors, trunnion supports restrict displacements but not all moments, enabling better flexibility in design. They are commonly used in applications like engine mounts, where a steady-rest can be added to manage the final degree of freedom. This design allows for the prevention of yawing and rolling, while still permitting some axial rotation. Overall, trunnion supports provide a balanced approach to pipe support that accommodates necessary movements without excessive constraints.
Ask1122
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi all, can someone please tell me what are the advantages of using a trunnion pipe support? I guess that since it is welded on the pipe, it will prevent pipe movements in any directions, but then why would you use a trunnion instead of an anchor?

Thank you!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
We use trunnion supports a lot for our engine mounts. The nice thing about trunnion mounts is that they don't over constrain. They restrict all displacements, but not all moments. You can add a simple steady-rest at the back to grab the final degree of freedom.

I am not real familiar with piping supports, but I hope we're talking about the same thing.
 
Thanks for the reply, but I am not sure how it restrict only the displacements but not the moment?
 
These are what we call trunnion mounts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Belarus-Vitsebsk-Monument_to_Heroes_of_Patriotic_War_of_1812-6.jpg

...mostly. The engine usually has the female end, basically just a hollow support. A pin of some sort is typically inserted into them that allows them to rotating in the pins axial direction. They prevent yawing and rolling, but not pitching.

We typically only restrict sideways motion on one of them, and they both restrict displacement in the vertical and axial directions. That leaves only one DOF left, which we use a "kind-of-pinned" joint at some aft location.

We use them because we can prevent over-constraining our part.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top