Afraid to Manipulate Complex Numbers

nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Hello. I'm currently following a course in Complex Analysis, but I'm often afraid of manipulating certain expressions. It is well known that certain "intuitively obvious" actions which are true for real numbers are not true for complex numbers, a simple one being \sqrt{-1}\sqrt{-1} \neq \sqrt {(-1)(-1)} and many others; there are quite some sites that warn you for these traps, but I can't seem to find any site which then tells me what is allowed. For example, instead of just saying "\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} does not necessarily equal \sqrt{ab}", I'd also like the site to say "but what stays true is that \sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} = \pm \sqrt{ab}". For example, something I'm wondering about: I know (a^x)^y = a^{xy} is not generally true anymore, but in what cases can I still do it anyway?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's hard to memorize what you can and can't do like that, so instead just remember definitions, definitions, definitions! x^y = \exp \left( y \log x \right)

a^{xy} = \exp \left( xy \log a \right)
(a^x)^y = \left( \exp \left(x \log a \right) \right)^y = \exp \left( y \log \left( \exp \left(x \log a \right) \right) \right).

So the 2nd matches the first if we address whether \log (\exp z) = z where z = x \log a. The subtleties of the complex logarithim and how it behaves with the exponential function is described very here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_logarithm . Using the definitions we can always reduce problems like the one here to one of the basic questions about complex logs, which that article informs you about.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top