Schools Age as negative factor in top math grad school admission?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around concerns regarding age as a factor in graduate school admissions, particularly for math programs at prestigious institutions like Princeton and Harvard. The original poster, a math major from South Korea, is worried that their age—26 at application and 27 when starting—might negatively impact their chances due to mandatory military service delaying their studies. Participants in the discussion clarify that age is generally not a critical factor in admissions for math and physics graduate programs. They cite examples of individuals who successfully pursued advanced degrees later in life, emphasizing that many older students enroll in these fields. However, there is a distinction made between different academic disciplines, noting that the job market and career paths can vary significantly, with social sciences potentially accommodating older students more readily than fields like physics. Overall, the consensus suggests that being 26 is not too old to apply to top graduate schools in mathematics.
LIFTNAlice
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am a math major in South Korea. Recently, one of my friends came to me with a rumor that age of the applicant is a critical factor in admission to top math grad school like princeton, harvard, etc...

What worries me is that due to the country's "mandatory military service law ", I cannot apply to any foreign grad schools until I am 26 (27 when I start grad school) , and my friend said that this is too old to be admitted.

I was wondering if any kind person could help me by telling me wheter or not what my friend said is true, and is 26 too old to be counted as a negative factor when applying to these "top" schools.(most important question :) )

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's with the empty lines?
 
Crake2// I put them so that people could read better...
 
LIFTNAlice said:
Crake2// I put them so that people could read better...

It doesn't. It makes it look weird and annoying.

Edit: the unnecessary line spacing was removed. If you wish to make your post easier to read, pay closer attention to paragraph breaks and sentence structure, not line spacing.

Zz.
 
I know for a fact that older (late 20s to middle aged) people enroll in graduate studies in math and physics. Robin Hanson got a PhD in his thirties from CalTech (physics).

Somewhere on another site is a long thread about mathematicians who succeeded later in life, many of whom didn't begin studies until later.
 
TomServo said:
I know for a fact that older (late 20s to middle aged) people enroll in graduate studies in math and physics. Robin Hanson got a PhD in his thirties from CalTech (physics).

After googling, I think you are referring to Robin Hanson at GMU, who has a phd in social science. This is a very different field/market then physics (most poli-sci/economics phds land a faculty position immediately post-phd. Most physics phds never land a faculty position, and those that do go through at least one postdoc, often more). I imagine you'll see many more older students in social science phd programs, because the path to a career is much safer and shorter.
 
Gah, you're right, his undergrad degree was in physics. He wrote in a blog post somewhere about going back to CalTech for a PhD and I assumed. I assumed! :(
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top