Air friction modeled as a differential equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling air friction for a falling object using a differential equation. The user successfully derived the velocity 'v' in terms of time 't' but is seeking confirmation on their expression for 'y' in terms of 't'. A key point raised is the assumption of an initial condition where velocity is zero at time t equals zero, which is not explicitly stated in the problem. The calculations for 'y' appear to be dimensionally incorrect, indicating a potential oversight in the formulation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of boundary conditions in solving differential equations accurately.
DoubleWs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Find 'y' in terms of 't' for the equation of the net force on a falling object ƩFy = mg-bv = ma
So I'm pretty sure I found the velocity in terms of time correctly, and I'm interested in having someone check my answer for 'y' in terms of time.

Homework Equations


ƩFy = mg-bv = ma
a = \frac{dv}{dt}
b = a constant (drag coefficient)

The Attempt at a Solution


mg - bv = ma

mg - bv = m\frac{dv}{dt}

g - \frac{bv}{m} = \frac{dv}{dt}

(g - \frac{bv}{m})dt = dv

∫dt = ∫\frac{dv}{g-(bv/m)}

g - \frac{bv}{m} = u

\frac{du}{dv} = \frac{-b}{m}

\frac{-m}{b}du = dv

∫dt = -\frac{m}{b}∫\frac{1}{u}du

t + C = \frac{-m}{b}ln(u)

t + C = \frac{-m}{b}ln(g - \frac{bv}{m})

\frac{-bt}{m} + C = ln(g - \frac{bv}{m})

e^{-bt/m} * C = g - \frac{bv}{m}

\frac{mg}{b} - C * e^{-bt/m} = v

\frac{mg}{b}(1 - e^{-bt/m}) = v

Ok, so there's 'v' in terms of 't'. Now...

\frac{mg}{b}(1 - e^{-bt/m}) = \frac{dy}{dt}

∫\frac{mg}{b}(1 - e^{-bt/m})dt = ∫dy

\frac{mg}{b}∫(1 - e^{-bt/m})dt = ∫dy

\frac{mg}{b}(t + \frac{m}{b}e^{-bt/m}) - C = y

\frac{mg}{b}(t + \frac{m}{b}e^{-bt/m}) - 1 = y

Just wondering if all of this is right, and if now, how can I fix it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello DoubleWs,

Welcome to Physics Forums!
DoubleWs said:
1. Find 'y' in terms of 't' for the equation of the net force on a falling object ƩFy = mg-bv = ma
So I'm pretty sure I found the velocity in terms of time correctly, and I'm interested in having someone check my answer for 'y' in terms of time.

Homework Equations


ƩFy = mg-bv = ma
a = \frac{dv}{dt}
b = a constant (drag coefficient)

The Attempt at a Solution


mg - bv = ma

mg - bv = m\frac{dv}{dt}

g - \frac{bv}{m} = \frac{dv}{dt}

(g - \frac{bv}{m})dt = dv

∫dt = ∫\frac{dv}{g-(bv/m)}

g - \frac{bv}{m} = u

\frac{du}{dv} = \frac{-b}{m}

\frac{-m}{b}du = dv

∫dt = -\frac{m}{b}∫\frac{1}{u}du

t + C = \frac{-m}{b}ln(u)

t + C = \frac{-m}{b}ln(g - \frac{bv}{m})

\frac{-bt}{m} + C = ln(g - \frac{bv}{m})

e^{-bt/m} * C = g - \frac{bv}{m}

\frac{mg}{b} - C * e^{-bt/m} = v
Everything up to this point looks pretty good. At least it's the same result that I came up with. :approve:
\frac{mg}{b}(1 - e^{-bt/m}) = v
But here you're making a big assumption. The above relationship is only true if there is a boundary condition (initial condition) that states v = 0 at time t = 0. There is no such boundary condition in the problem statement.

It might not be a bad assumption though, all I'm saying is the problem statement never mentions it. (There probably should be some sort of boundary conditions though, because if the initial velocity was in the opposite direction [heading up], none of the above would apply for that situation, because the differential equation would become ƩFy = mg+bv = ma until the object turned around.)

All your work below is contingent upon this assumption, so I'll treat everything below as though v = 0 at time t = 0.
Ok, so there's 'v' in terms of 't'. Now...

\frac{mg}{b}(1 - e^{-bt/m}) = \frac{dy}{dt}

∫\frac{mg}{b}(1 - e^{-bt/m})dt = ∫dy

\frac{mg}{b}∫(1 - e^{-bt/m})dt = ∫dy

\frac{mg}{b}(t + \frac{m}{b}e^{-bt/m}) - C = y
Everything seems to check out so far. :approve:
\frac{mg}{b}(t + \frac{m}{b}e^{-bt/m}) - 1 = y
Something is a bit wrong with the above. I'm assuming here that you have assumed that y = 0 at time t = 0. But even with that assumption, something is still not right. It could be simple matter of missing parenthesis and/or parenthesis not in the right place. But as the equation stands now, it's not dimensionally correct (the y has units of length, and the 1 has no units at all); and y ≠ 0 at time t = 0, which is what I'm guessing you wanted to assume in the first place.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top