Airflow for engine room ventilation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ISO 8861 formula for calculating airflow needed for heat evacuation in engine rooms, specifically addressing the empirical factor of 0.4 in the equation. The original poster seeks clarification on the second half of the formula, which accounts for combustion air needs. Another participant suggests that the arrangement of air intake relative to heat sources may influence the factor, indicating that airflow dynamics could affect the value of 0.4. The conversation highlights the need for further investigation into variables impacting this factor. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective engine room ventilation design.
xereux
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello fellow engineers!
i just started work at a marine company and was assigned to investigate on this formula.
it is from ISO 8861 and used to caculate the airflow needed for heat evacuation in a engine room.
this is the formula,
airflow needed = (heat emitted from engine and all other sources)/(air density X specific heat capicity of air X change in temp) - 0.4(air needed for combustion in engine) - air needed for combustion in boiler.

i don't understand the second half of the equation. i was told that this is a empirical formula and the value of 0.4 can change under special arrangement in the engine room.
my role is to investigate on the factor of 0.4 and find out the variable affecting it.
has anyone came across this equation before or anyone has any idea how should i approach this problem?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
xereux said:
hello fellow engineers!
i just started work at a marine company and was assigned to investigate on this formula.
it is from ISO 8861 and used to caculate the airflow needed for heat evacuation in a engine room.
this is the formula,
airflow needed = (heat emitted from engine and all other sources)/(air density X specific heat capicity of air X change in temp) - 0.4(air needed for combustion in engine) - air needed for combustion in boiler.

i don't understand the second half of the equation. i was told that this is a empirical formula and the value of 0.4 can change under special arrangement in the engine room.
my role is to investigate on the factor of 0.4 and find out the variable affecting it.
has anyone came across this equation before or anyone has any idea how should i approach this problem?

Hey..Hey.. I am looking at the same problem. I personally think that the arrangement of the air intake on the internal combustion engine in relation with the heat source is the deciding factor. If most of the airflow pass through the heat soource first before being consume by the engine than the factor use will be higher than 0.4. Just my humble opinion, do you have any better explanation than this that you want to share.
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Back
Top