A Alcubierre Drive Direction: How Does Craft Move?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Davephaelon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Drive
Davephaelon
Messages
139
Reaction score
22
I was watching an excellent presentation of the theory of the Alcubierre warp given by Miguel Alcubierre himself at the 2017 Starship Congress (link below). At the 43:55 mark Alcubierre explains that the negative energy is located around the circumference of the craft in a toroid. I always thought that it was located at the rear of the craft where spacetime is expanded, so this was a surprise. But that made me wonder how does the craft decide which way to move, since at first glance the configuration seemed to be perfectly symmetrical forward and back. I did, however, notice that in the diagram on the screen, (at 43:55), the side profile view of the negative energy region looks to be slightly forward of center, as defined by the x-y coordinate grid. So maybe that's the answer.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
At 47:45, he goes into the "horizon" problem, saying you can't put the negative energy in front of the ship from inside the ship. The diagram shows the negative energy expanding spacetime in the front and the spacetime contracting behind the ship, from undisclosed reasoning. How that configuration arises, after like you said he states the negative energy is needed symmetrically around the ships sides, is beyond me. My laymen's two cents seems to think the actual motion of the ship through space is amplified by the warp bubble, and again the unsolved horizon problem means you'd have to have an exterior preexisting warp field to travel through since there is no known way to project that warp field from the ship utilizing it.
 
jerromyjon, Thanks for the response. I'm pretty sure the horizon problem only occurs if the ship is superluminal, but will have to check up on that. I'm tempted to write to Harold "Sonny" White about this issue of the spacetime expanding behind the ship, even though the negative energy material is located around the circumference of the ship. I'm also wondering if this single toroidal region of negative material is also responsible for the contraction of space forward of the ship, which admittedly doesn't make sense to me as a layperson, as such material is only supposed to expand spacetime. I suspect I need to really knuckle down and understand the metric equations for this warp system before I can appreciate how it actually works.
 
Some time ago, probably several years, I had printed out Dr. Harold White's "Warp Field Mechanics 101" paper. I finally found it, and to my delight he addresses exactly the problem of which direction the craft starts to move in from a stationary start. The argument in the paper is somewhat technical, but the gist of it is if the craft already has a direction of motion from a conventional rocket engine, then it will select that direction when the warp field is turned on.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
Davephaelon said:
The argument in the paper is somewhat technical, but the gist of it is if the craft already has a direction of motion from a conventional rocket engine, then it will select that direction when the warp field is turned on.

But the initial motion is frame-dependent and in the rest frame of the ship there is no motion at all.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top