Algebra Problem with Capacitators

  • Thread starter Thread starter dempster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an algebra problem involving capacitors and charge distribution. The initial equations provided are Q0 = Q1 + Q2 and Q1/C1 = Q2/C2, but the user struggles with algebraic manipulation to derive the correct formula for Q1. Participants suggest starting with the relationship between the charges and emphasize the importance of proper notation and clarity in equations. They recommend solving for Q2 in terms of Q1, substituting back into the first equation, and factoring to isolate Q1. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for a clear understanding of the physical principles behind charge distribution in capacitors.
dempster
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Q0=Q1+Q2 Q1/C1 =Q2/C2 I substituted it Q1/C1=Q0-Q1/C2 then I got Q1=C1Q0-C1Q1/C2 but the answer has to be Q1=Q0C1/C1+C2 my algebra isn't good enough to solve it what are the steps that I have to take to make it to the answer

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please be more clear with your spacing and parentheses.
Are you saying that you have ## Q_0 = Q_1 + Q_2 \frac {Q_1}{C_1} = \frac {Q_2}{C_2} ?##
## \frac{Q_1}{C_1} = Q_0 - \frac{Q_1}{C_2}?##
This is very difficult to follow and does not make much sense.

Or are you saying that ## Q_0 = Q_1 + Q_2## and ##\frac {Q_1}{C_1} = \frac {Q_2}{C_2}##?
In any case, if you are solving for Q1, you should not have it in your answer as you did when you wrote:
##Q_1 = C_1Q_0 - \frac{C_1Q_1}{C_2}##.

If you have ## Q_0 = Q_1 + Q_2## and ##\frac {Q_1}{C_1} = \frac {Q_2}{C_2}##, then start by solving for Q2 in terms of Q1 from the second relation. Then substitute that into the first and solve for Q1.
 
Q0=Q1+Q2 I made that to Q2=Q0-Q1 Then this Applies Q1/C1=Q2/C2 I substituted Q2 and did everything times C1 so I got Q1= C1(Q0-Q1)/C2 but I know that the answer should be Q1= C1Q0/C1+C2 But I can't make the steps to make that happen?
 
Add ##\frac{C1Q1}{C2}## to each side.
Factor out Q1 on left.
Divide to solve for Q1.
 
" I know that the answer should be Q1= C1Q0/C1+C2"

You should bracket those last two terms otherwise apart from anything else it's physical nonsense, essentially a charge equal to a charge plus a capacitance. Would also have been better if you started by stating what you are looking to obtain.

It might be better to start with the equation relating two charges rather than three. Then you just get one charge in terms of the other (and the capacitances). Thus Q2 = Q1C2/C1
From which you can get
Q0 = Q1(1 + C2/C1)

Which you can throw into the form or your desired equation or else you could get that more directly.

This looks like being about how total charge distributes itself between two capacitors in parallel, so you should also think about it physically to realize the equations make sense. Your can eliminate various different parameters by choice, express all and any of the charges in terms of just one.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top