[Algebra] Proving equations involving modulo functions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ellipsis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Functions
ellipsis
Messages
158
Reaction score
24
I would like to know some general properties of the modulo (remainder) function that I can use to rewrite expressions. For example, say we wanted to prove the following by rewriting the right-hand-side:

$$ \Big{\lfloor} \frac{n}{d} \Big{\rfloor} = \frac{n - n \pmod d}{d} $$

I have no idea how to prove this statement formally. Intuitively, ##n \pmod d## is the remainder of whatever ##\big{\lfloor} \frac{n}{d} \big{\rfloor}## is, and therefore

$$ n \pmod d = n - d \Big{\lfloor} \frac{n}{d} \Big{\rfloor}$$

Which, when we insert it into the right-hand side of what I'm trying to prove, results in:

$$ \frac{n - (n - d \big{\lfloor} \frac{n}{d} \big{\rfloor})}{d} $$

Which, thankfully, boils down to:

$$ \Big{\lfloor} \frac{n}{d} \Big{\rfloor} $$

What I want to know is: How do I formalize the beginning of this proof? Is there some general property or definition of the modulo function which I can invoke to justify that step?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
a = n mod d is defined as a number between 0 and d such that there exists an integer c such that n = cd+a.
When you take d*floor(n/d), you are essentially saying that floor(n/d) = c. That is, there is no integer larger than c such that cd is less than or equal to n.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top