Algorithm-how to proceed (numerical techniques)

  • Thread starter Thread starter shalini.singh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around integrating a function defined at the vertices of triangular and quadrilateral elements within a 2D domain, specifically along designated strips. The user seeks a more effective algorithm for this integration process, outlining initial steps that include identifying intersected elements and determining function values at intersection points. A suggestion is made regarding the use of Chebyshev polynomials for numerical integration, but the user lacks familiarity with this method. A critical point raised is the need for a clearer problem description, particularly regarding the function values at non-vertex points and the purpose of the strips. The conversation highlights the complexities of numerical integration in this context, emphasizing the importance of understanding the geometry involved.
shalini.singh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My problem is like this:

I have a 2 dimensional domain

Now, that domain is made up of eleemnts- these elemnts are triangular
or quadrilateral in shape. Each triangualr and quadrilateral element has 3 and 4 vertices (a triangular element has 3 vertices and quadrilateral has 4 vertices).

We have fixed function values at these vertices- the function is (Say) F

In that 2-D domain we define a strip (a strip is just a part of the area of that domain), A strip may have several sections - (those) lines as in attached figure (summary-figure.jpg)- the vertical lines are sections.

What I need is::

I need to integrate the resultant (function) along the length of each design strip section and
hence across the width of the design strip.

I could think to proceed in the following steps::

The inputs are:

A) All the triangle/quadrilateral vertices
B) Function values at all the vertices
C) The line over which you want to integrate
D)geometry of the strip

The broad algorithm would be like this:
1. Find which quadrilaterals/triangles this line intersects
2. Find the function values at the points of intersection of the line with the sides of these quadrilatrals/triangles
3. Use numerical integration to integrate the function from these values

Can anyone help me with a better algorithm?

Also, how would I proceed with 3 above?What would be the best for numerical integration?

Someone suggested about Chebyshev polynomials- but I do not have any idea of it!

Please please can anyone help?It si very urgent

Shalini
 

Attachments

  • summary-figure.JPG
    summary-figure.JPG
    19.5 KB · Views: 600
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To get a better algorithm you will have to get a better problem description first. It is not clear what the function values are if the point isn't a vertex, i.e. it is not clear what to integrate or maybe just sum. However this is essential to know. Also the role of your strips and sections is not clear. And last but not least, integration over a closed path, let it be a triangle, quadrilateral or circle yields always zero as result. This is because volumes, areas in our case, are oriented and we move backwards the same amount as we move forward, so we end up with zero.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top