Almost ashamed to ask this question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RadiationX
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Both equations for a line, Y - Y1 = m(X - X1) and Y = mX + B, are essentially the same, with the first being a point-slope form and the second a slope-intercept form. The confusion arises when determining the y-intercept using two points; plugging in values can lead to incorrect conclusions if not done carefully. For example, using the points (2,12) and (6,0), the correct slope (m) can be calculated, leading to the accurate equation of the line. The point-slope form is primarily used to find the slope, while the slope-intercept form directly provides the y-intercept. Understanding the relationship between the two forms clarifies their usage in finding line equations.
RadiationX
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
When we want to find the equation of a line we can use:
Y-Y_1 = m(X-X_1) or Y = mX + B

My question is aren't both equations essentially the same?

For equation 1. If I know two points that the line passes through just by plugging and chugging won't that lead to what the Y intercept is?

For example I have these two points that a line passes through: (2,12) & (6,0).
by looking at the graph I know that the line has a Y intercept, even though it is not drawn. When I use equation one my constant (B) the Y intercept is 0 even though it should not be. What the heck am I doing wrong?:biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, they are the same equation. I'm not sure what you're doing wrong, but if we use your first equation, put one point in (say (6,0)), then y-0=m(x-6) => y=m(x-6). Then use the second point to find m; 12=m(2-6) => m=-3; thus y=-3(x-6)=-3x+18 is the equation for the line.
 
Yes they are the same, the second one is a special case where Y_{1} is the y intercept (B) and thus X_{1} is 0 so you get Y=mX+Y_{1}

edit: woops, hi cristo =-).
 
dontdisturbmycircles said:
edit: woops, hi cristo =-).
Haha; that gets me back for butting into your thread earlier! :wink:
 
cristo said:
Yes, they are the same equation. I'm not sure what you're doing wrong, but if we use your first equation, put one point in (say (6,0)), then y-0=m(x-6) => y=m(x-6). Then use the second point to find m; 12=m(2-6) => m=-3; thus y=-3(x-6)=-3x+18 is the equation for the line.

You have hit upon the point of my confusion exactly cristo! Jeez, so simple but I have not used this equation since precalc so i forgot how it worked! the point slope form of the line is used to find the slope of the line. It is the variable that we are solving for.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Back
Top