Alpha decay in elements under 35

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding an example of alpha decay involving elements with atomic numbers up to 35 for a chemistry paper. It highlights that light elements typically undergo decay through processes like electron capture or beta decay rather than alpha decay. Clarification is sought regarding whether "35" refers to atomic number or mass number. An example provided is beryllium-8 (8Be), which is known for its alpha emission but is highly unstable. Additionally, the conversation touches on light nuclei that can undergo (n,α) reactions, such as lithium-6 interacting with neutrons. The user specifies that they are looking for a plausible isotope for their paper, not just any random selection.
STEM Chemistry
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For a chemistry paper I'm writing, I have to include an example of alpha decay using only elements up to number 35, however, I can't find one that would actually work. Does anyone know of any that could be used?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
STEM Chemistry said:
Does anyone know of any that could be used?
What does one mean by 'used'?

Generally, light elements decay by electron capture (for A < 2Z), and sometime positron emission, or by β-decay for A > 2Z.

With respect to 35, is one referring to atomic number, Z, or mass, A?

An obvious radionuclide that decays by alpha emission is 8Be, which is highly unstable.

See - http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=4&n=4 (Select Zoom 1). A number of light nuclei undergo (n,α) reactions, e.g., 6Li + n -> t + α.
 
Thank you, I was refrigerator to the atomic number and by used I simpy meant an isotope that would be plausible, not just a randomly selected one. Thanks again.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
832
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top