Alpha does not vary with time - new study's stringent limits

AI Thread Summary
A recent study using the Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile provides strong evidence that the fine structure constant, alpha, has remained constant over billions of years. The research indicates that alpha has varied by only 0.6 parts per million over approximately 10 billion years, while results from the ancient Oklo natural reactor show a variation of about 2 parts per 100 million over the past 2 billion years. This consistency of alpha is crucial for understanding fundamental physical laws and the structure of the universe. The discussion also touches on the lack of a direct relationship between the age of the universe and the fine structure constant. Overall, the findings reinforce the stability of fundamental constants in physics.
Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,392
Reaction score
3
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2004/pr-05-04.html reports the work of a team of astronomers using the VLT in Chile.

"To explain the Universe and to represent it mathematically, scientists rely on so-called fundamental constants or fixed numbers. The fundamental laws of physics, as we presently understand them, depend on about 25 such constants. Well-known examples are the gravitational constant, which defines the strength of the force acting between two bodies, such as the Earth and the Moon, and the speed of light.

One of these constants is the so-called "fine structure constant", alpha = 1/137.03599958, a combination of electrical charge of the electron, the Planck constant and the speed of light. The fine structure constant describes how electromagnetic forces hold atoms together and the way light interacts with atoms.[/color]"

In summary, results from the ancient Oklo natural reactor show alpha is constant to within ~2 parts per 100 million over the past ~2 billion years; the VLT results ~0.6 parts per million over ~10 billion years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
most impressive, rock solid evidence :smile:
 
Nereid said:
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2004/pr-05-04.html reports the work of a team of astronomers using the VLT in Chile.

"To explain the Universe and to represent it mathematically, scientists rely on so-called fundamental constants or fixed numbers. The fundamental laws of physics, as we presently understand them, depend on about 25 such constants. Well-known examples are the gravitational constant, which defines the strength of the force acting between two bodies, such as the Earth and the Moon, and the speed of light.

One of these constants is the so-called "fine structure constant", alpha = 1/137.03599958, a combination of electrical charge of the electron, the Planck constant and the speed of light. The fine structure constant describes how electromagnetic forces hold atoms together and the way light interacts with atoms.[/color]"

In summary, results from the ancient Oklo natural reactor show alpha is constant to within ~2 parts per 100 million over the past ~2 billion years; the VLT results ~0.6 parts per million over ~10 billion years.


Hello Ms. Nereid,

Do you have any idea how to relate the age of the universe to the fine structure constant?

Kind regards,

StarThrower
 
Last edited by a moderator:
StarThrower said:
Hello Ms. Nereid,

Do you have any idea how to relate the age of the universe to the fine structure constant?

Kind regards,

StarThrower
Hi StarThrower,

I'm not sure I understand what you are asking ... AFAIK, there is no direct relationship between alpha and the age of the universe.

The question which the research I cited sought to address is the extent to which alpha has varied, over billions of years of time. Unlike the Oklo work, the research addressed this question by analysis of the light from very distant objects (being distant, we see - now - the objects as they were billions of years ago).

Nereid
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top