What Is the Approximate RMS Voltage of a Sinusoidal Wave?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the approximate RMS voltage of a sinusoidal wave, one can use the relationship between peak voltage (Vp) and RMS voltage (Vrms), where Vrms = Vp/√2. The discussion emphasizes the importance of measuring the peak-to-peak voltage (Vpp) to derive the RMS value, with the formula Vpp = 2 * Vp. Participants express uncertainty about finding the RMS voltage and seek clarification on the relationship between Vp and RMS. A link to a resource on RMS current is provided for further understanding. The conversation highlights the need for clear explanations of these electrical concepts.
Rasine
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
alternating current wave prob...

assume the wave is sinusoidal. suppose that each horizontal division (13) represents 1.0 ns and that each vertical division (11) represents 1 mV. what is the approx. rms voltage?

please help me solve this.

i am not so sure how to find rms, and if you do please explain it.

thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rasine said:
assume the wave is sinusoidal. suppose that each horizontal division (13) represents 1.0 ns and that each vertical division (11) represents 1 mV. what is the approx. rms voltage?

please help me solve this.

i am not so sure how to find rms, and if you do please explain it.

thank you.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/acres.html#c2

Look at the example for RMS current.

Zz.
 
Rasine said:
assume the wave is sinusoidal. suppose that each horizontal division (13) represents 1.0 ns and that each vertical division (11) represents 1 mV. what is the approx. rms voltage?

please help me solve this.

i am not so sure how to find rms, and if you do please explain it.

thank you.
Were you trying to post some waveform? 11/13/etc. Whatever. If you want the RMS, just use the Vpp measurement to get you there. Vp= sqrt(2)*Vrms, Vpp = 2*sqrt(2)(Vrms)


EDIT -- If you want a more complete explanation of RMS versus Vpp, we can oblige.
 
what is the Vp measurement? and how does it related to rms?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top