Can Direct Use of cosh(2y) and cos(2x) Prove the Trigonometric Identity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrWarlock616
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the identity ##\cosh(2y) - \cos(2x) = 2## using the relationship ##\sin(x + iy) = \cos(\alpha) + i\sin(\alpha)##. Participants derive equations for ##\cos(\alpha)## and ##\sin(\alpha)## by expanding and equating real and imaginary parts. They explore whether direct use of ##\cosh(2y)## and ##\cos(2x)## can simplify the proof, but find it challenging. Alternative approaches involving trigonometric identities are suggested, particularly using the relationship between hyperbolic and trigonometric functions. The conversation concludes with acknowledgment of the complexity and a suggestion that identities can be manipulated creatively.
MrWarlock616
Messages
160
Reaction score
3
I need to prove that if ##\sin(x+iy)=cos(\alpha)+i\sin(\alpha)## , then ##\cosh(2y)-\cos(2x)=2##

expanding sin(x+iy) and equating real and imaginary parts, we get:
##\cos(\alpha)=\sin(x)\cosh(y)## -- (1)
and ## \sin(\alpha)=\cos(x)\sinh(y) ## -- (2)

if we use ##\cos^2(\alpha)+\sin^2(\alpha)=1 ## and put the values from (1) and (2) , we can get the required expression. My question is that, is there an alternative to do this? Can I prove it by directly using the values of cosh2y and cos2x [from (1) and (2)]? I tried but it seems impossible. Why is it so?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
use
cosh(a)=cos(i a)
then
cos(2a)-cos(2b)=-2sin(a-b)sin(a+b)
and so forth
 
lurflurf said:
use
cosh(a)=cos(i a)
then
cos(2a)-cos(2b)=-2sin(a-b)sin(a+b)
and so forth

ok..what is a and b?
 
Whatever you want (those are identities), in this case perhaps
cosh(2y)=cos(2i y)
cos(2iy)-cos(2x)=-2sin(iy-x)sin(iy+x)
 
lurflurf said:
Whatever you want (those are identities), in this case perhaps
cosh(2y)=cos(2i y)
cos(2iy)-cos(2x)=-2sin(iy-x)sin(iy+x)

Ok that is brilliant. thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top