Alternators and electrical motors

  • Thread starter Thread starter d.smith292
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrical Motors
AI Thread Summary
Motors can indeed be converted into generators and vice versa, as they operate on the same principles but in reverse. The efficiency of a motor-turned-alternator may not match that of a purpose-built alternator due to specific design considerations. One key factor is armature reaction, which affects the positioning of brushes to optimize power collection. Correcting for armature reaction is crucial, as improper brush placement can lead to power loss and arcing. Understanding these differences is essential for effective design and application in electrical systems.
d.smith292
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
After reading about a guy who used a permanent magnet dc motor for his wind turbine, I got confused. Can motors be used as alternators?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can easily convert most types of motors into generators and vice versa I believe. How hard it is depends on the exact type of motor or generator that you have.

When you look at a generator, the principles are exactly like the principles in a motor, only reversed. In a generator you have something spin a magnetic source which creates electrical energy. In a motor you have electrical energy turning a magnetic source which creates motion.
 
Thank you for your help
 
How efficient would it motor-turned-alternator be, compared to a purpose-designed alternator? Are there are different engineering and design concerns between the two?
 
Purpose built DC generators can have a correction for armature reaction.

This is a method of moving the brushes so that they can collect maximum power from the armature. This is not the same position as a motor would use.

You can read about this effect here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armature_reaction
I'll quote it here since it is important:

Since an armature is wound with coils of wire, a magnetic field is set up in the armature whenever a current flows in the coils. This field is at right angles to the generator field, and is called cross magnetization of the armature. The effect of the armature field is to distort the generator field and shift the neutral plane. The neutral plane is the position where the armature windings are moving parallel to the magnetic flux lines. This effect is known as armature reaction and is proportional to the current flowing in the armature coils.

The brushes of a generator must be set in the neutral plane; that is, they must contact segments of the commutator that are connected to armature coils having no induced emf. If the brushes were contacting commutator segments outside the neutral plane, they would short-circuit "live" coils and cause arcing and loss of power.

Armature reaction causes the neutral plane to shift in the direction of rotation, and if the brushes are in the neutral plane at no load, that is, when no armature current is flowing, they will not be in the neutral plane when armature current is flowing. For this reason it is desirable to incorporate a corrective system into the generator design.

These are two principal methods by which the effect of armature reaction is overcome. The first method is to shift the position of the brushes so that they are in the neutral plane when the generator is producing its normal load current. in the other method, special field poles, called interpoles, are installed in the generator to counteract the effect of armature reaction.

The brush-setting method is satisfactory in installations in which the generator operates under a fairly constant load. If the load varies to a marked degree, the neutral plane will shift proportionately, and the brushes will not be in the correct position at all times. The brush-setting method is the most common means of correcting for armature reaction in small generators (those producing approximately 1000 W or less). Larger generators require the use of interpoles.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top