Am I Calculating the Moment of Inertia Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter noname1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment
AI Thread Summary
The user is seeking confirmation on their calculation of the moment of inertia for a setup involving a pulley and point masses. They have provided specific values for the hanging mass, pulley radius, point masses, and acceleration. The initial calculation for the moment of inertia of the bare arm is presented, yielding a result of 0.0730. The user is uncertain if their approach is correct and is looking for guidance on the calculation method. Clarification on the calculation process for both the bare arm and the inclusion of point masses is requested.
noname1
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
I need to calculate the moment of inertia of the setup below and i am confused.i have to initially calculate it without the point of masses and than with the point of masses. I have already calculated the acceleration for each of the experiments.


The info i have is:

Hanging mass - .050kg

Pulley Radius - .010m

Point of mass 1 - .250kg

Point of mass 2 - .250kg

Acceleration - 0.00671



I believe the moment of inertia of the bare arm is

I = mr²((g-a)/a)

I = .050*.010² * ((9.8-0.00671)/0.00671)

I = 0.000005 * 1459.51 = 0.0730

Am i calculating this correctly?

thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 436
Physics news on Phys.org
can anyone tell me if this is the way i should calculate it?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top