Ammeter and voltmeter in circuit

AI Thread Summary
Introducing an ammeter or voltmeter into a circuit alters its behavior due to the meters' inherent resistances. An ammeter uses a shunt with known resistance to measure current, while a voltmeter typically has high internal resistance, which can affect circuit performance. The resistance of contact leads can also influence measurements, although it is often neglected in basic experiments. Variations in readings can occur due to the tolerance of resistors and the precision limits of the measuring instruments. Overall, the accuracy of measurements is influenced by both the inherent tolerances of components and the characteristics of the meters used.
ranger
Gold Member
Messages
1,685
Reaction score
2
Why is that when I introduce an ammeter or a voltmeter into a circuit, it alters it. In other words how does a *meter affect the circuit? I read somewhere that when you measure the resistance [using an ammeter], it is slightly different from the actual value. Why does this happen?

And one more question. I did an experiment and they said that I should neglect the resistace of contacting leads used to hook up the circuit. That must mean that it could affect my results then. How so?--thank you.:cool:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The ampmeter has a shunt of known resistance and can determine the current simply by the voltage drop across that known resistance (or hall effect).

The voltmeter has a high internal resistance of something like 1 MOhm but in some cases this will affect the circuit as well. And some voltmeters will have a much lower internal resistance.

Look up Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle about how the more you know about a subatomic particle's speed the less you know about its position or vice-versa. Its about how just observing the particle changes it.

Hopefully the effect is minimal and can be discarded.

Resistors have a tolerance (meaning they will vary a certain percent from the number on them), and meter's have only a certain level of precision as well with most being only good to a certain percentage of the value displayed.

So if you measured 7.69V one time and 7.61V the next, that is easily within the range of values that should be considered the same because it is smaller than the margin of error that is likely +/- 0.1V or more.
 
Thanks for the input Cliff_J.
 
See in science you must know that nothing is just accurate, you must accept to have some tolerance somewhere and the amount of tolerance you have mainly depends on what your working on, in very simple circuits you can have about 5% to 10% tolerance of the values written and measured but in more complicated circuits like VLSI & ULSI ,tolerance tends to be very small so the type's of instrument you use to measure differ from that your using right now.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top