Amount of CaO required to removed HCO3- from 1 kg of hard water

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantum Mind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Water
AI Thread Summary
To remove HCO3- from 1 kg of hard water containing 305 ppm of HCO3-, the correct stoichiometric equation is CaO + 2HCO3- = CaCO3 + CO3-- + H2O. Given that 1 mole of HCO3- weighs 61 g and 1 mole of CaO weighs 56 g, the required amount of CaO can be calculated. For 0.305 g of HCO3-, approximately 0.140 g (or 140 mg) of CaO is needed. The initial confusion arose from incorrectly including Ca2+ in the reaction equation. This calculation clarifies the minimum mass of CaO required for complete removal of HCO3-.
Quantum Mind
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sample of hard water contains 305 ppm of HCO3- ions. What is the minimum mass of CaO required to remove HCO3- completely from 1 kg of water sample?



Homework Equations



Ca 2+ + 2HCO3 + CaO = 2CaCO3 + H2O

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the HCO3- ions are 305 parts per million, it can be assumed that there are 0.305 g of the ions in 1 kg (or 1 L as the density is 1) of water. (I don't know if this assumption is correct)

If I use the equation as above, then I get 0.1525 g of CaO which is not correct.

I think that the whole trouble is with the ppm part. Can someone give me a clue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equation is incorrect - you are assuming there is some other source of Ca2+ to be present as well, while the only source of calcium is CaO.
 
Sorry for the delayed response.

Ca 2+ should not have been there, my mistake. The equation is

CaO + 2HCO3- = CaCO3 + CO3-- + H2O

Now one mole of CaO reacts with two moles of HCO3. This means that for half a mole of CaO, there ought to be one mole of HCO3.

1 mole of HCO3 = 61 g and 1 mole of CaO is 56 g. In this case it would be 28 g of CaO.

Therefore, 28/61 x .305 gives 0.140 g or 140 mg.

Got it, thanks.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top