Ampere's Law with a coaxial cable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Ampere's Law to determine the magnetic field around a coaxial cable with a central and outer conductor carrying equal but opposite currents. In region (a), the magnetic field is derived as B = (μI)/(2πr1), correcting a misunderstanding about the area used in calculations. For region (b), the confusion arises from assuming no current is enclosed, while the actual enclosed current must be considered. In region (c), the net current is calculated as I = I1 - I2, which clarifies the magnetic field's behavior. Overall, understanding the concept of enclosed current is crucial for correctly applying Ampere's Law in these scenarios.
Ignitia
Messages
21
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A portion of a long, cylindrical coaxial cable is shown
in the accompanying figure. A current I flows down the
center conductor, and this current is returned in the outer
conductor. Determine the magnetic field in the regions (a)
R ≤ r1, (b) r2 ≥ R ≥ r1, (c) r3 ≥ R ≥ r2, and (d)
R ≥ r3. Assume that the current is distributed uniformly
over the cross sections of the two parts of the cable.

media%2F088%2F088be225-7b5c-44c5-98d6-f936f309dda3%2FphpxpG6y9.png


Homework Equations


B∫dl = μI

Inner current = I1
Outer Current = I2

I = J*A
J = Current Density
A = Area

The Attempt at a Solution


(a) R ≤ r1
B∫dl = μI
B*2πR = μ*J*A
B*2πR = μ*(I/πr12)*πR2
B = (μ*I*R)/2πr12
The answer given states it's only B = (μ*I*R)/r12 Why is that?

(b) r2 ≥ R ≥ r1

My thinking was that since this is outside the conductor, B = 0T since I = 0. The answer says the enclosed charge would be I, not 0, but doesn't go into any further detail. Can someone please explain why?

(c) r3 ≥ R ≥ r2
My answer was the same as a and was wrong, and likely related to B. the book stated that I = I1 - I2. Why is this?

(d) R ≥ r3
Since it's outside the conductor, then I = 0 and B = 0T This was correct.

Thanks for the help.
 

Attachments

  • media%2F088%2F088be225-7b5c-44c5-98d6-f936f309dda3%2FphpxpG6y9.png
    media%2F088%2F088be225-7b5c-44c5-98d6-f936f309dda3%2FphpxpG6y9.png
    16.7 KB · Views: 2,277
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems you have some problems understanding what the enclosed current in Ampere's law is. That there is no current where the loop is does not matter. The only thing that matters is how much current passes through an area that has the loop as its boundary. So for example, in the case of ##r_1 < r < r_2##, the area could be a disk with radius ##r##, what would be the current through this disk? This problem affects both (b) and (c).

For (a), there definitely should be a ##2\pi## in the denominator. The field is ##B = \mu_0 I_{\rm enc}/(2\pi r)## and ##I_{\rm enc} = I r^2/r_1^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes Ignitia
Okay, I see what my confusion is now. I was thinking the area was shaped like a washer, and only integrated from r1 to r2, not from 0 to r2. I got it now!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top