Amplified Tuner Circuit, Finding Resonant Frequency

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on finding the resonant frequency of an amplified tuner circuit, exploring both theoretical calculations and practical experimental results. Participants examine the discrepancies between calculated and observed frequencies, considering factors such as component tolerances, circuit layout, and equipment characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the resonant frequency using the formula f = 1/2*pi*√LC with values of 22pF and 47mH, yielding 156.5kHz, but notes practical results suggest a frequency between 65kHz and 75kHz.
  • Another participant questions the impact of oscilloscope impedance and probe characteristics, suggesting they may form a parallel tuned circuit affecting the resonant frequency.
  • Concerns are raised about the tolerances of the tank components, with a request for clarification on whether they are 1% or 10% parts.
  • Stray capacitance and circuit layout are mentioned as potential factors that could lower the resonant frequency, with one participant estimating it could drop to around 120kHz due to these effects.
  • One participant points out that the small capacitance combined with a large inductance may lead to issues, suggesting that the interwinding capacitance of the coil could exceed 22pF, complicating calculations.
  • A redesign is proposed by one participant to achieve the desired resonance, suggesting different component values of 2200pF and 0.47mH.
  • The original poster mentions simulating the circuit in Proteus, which also yields a frequency of 150kHz, indicating potential issues with the physical components used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasons for the discrepancies in resonant frequency, with no consensus reached on the primary cause. Multiple competing hypotheses regarding component effects and circuit design remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific details on oscilloscope impedance and probe characteristics, which may influence the results. The discussion also highlights potential issues with component tolerances and stray capacitance, but these factors are not fully quantified.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and hobbyists working with resonant circuits, particularly those exploring the effects of component values and circuit layout on frequency response.

liamporter1702
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I am looking to find the resonant frequency of the amplified tuner circuit below
The equation I have attempted to use is the f = 1/2*pi*√LC
With the values for the inductance capacitance being 22pF and 47mH as I believe this is the tuner part of the circuit?
The value I get by inserting these values is 156.5kHz.
But from doing a practical experiment using this circuit I know the resonant frequency is somewhere between 65kHz and 75kHz. Can faulty equipment be to blame for such a difference in values? Or is there a specific equation to be used for amplified tuner circuits?
Thanks for any help!
2sbmzk7.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any details about the impedance of the oscilloscope and the probe used? Along with the output coupling capacitor they will represent another tuned circuit in parallel with the intended load (LC tank). A typical oscilloscope's input impedance might be represented by 1 MegOhm in parallel with around 10 or 15 pF. A probe and its cable will modify that.

Do you have details on the tank component tolerances? Are they 1% parts? 10%?

For high frequencies, circuit layout and construction can become important. Stray capacitance might affect your tank's resonant frequency if leads are long or carelessly arranged near other parts or metal objects.

Your 156 kHz value should be correct for the given tank circuit. I'm guessing that oscilloscope loading and moderate stray capacitance might pull the net resonant frequency downwards a bit, maybe closer to 120 kHz if things are bad. 75 kHz seems a bit of a stretch.

I note that your 75 kHz is about half the expected frequency. How did the signal shapes look on the oscilloscope? Any sign of clipping or other non-linearity? Clipping might introduce a 2nd harmonic that the tank is responding to.
 
22pF is a VERY small capacitance. I agree with gneill that parasitic capacitance is probably a factor here.
But beyond that, combining such a small C with such a large L is problematic in itself. In fact, the interwinding capacitance of your coil is probably beyond 22 pF, and the self-resonant frequency is probably close to your calculated 150 kHz. This means that your coil looks like a resistor, not a coil, throwing calculations off badly.

I suggest a redesign if you want 150 kHz resonance: 2200 pF and 0.47 mH.
 
Sorry this was part of a university experiment so I don't have any values for oscilloscope impedance and the probes I used, I'm in my first year so I'm still learning, these values now seem like a good idea to ask for hahaa.

I wouldn't say leads were particularly long or carelessly arranged, but this may be part of the problem.

I have attached a picture of the waveforms I obtained from my circuit but clipping does not seem to be a problem to me.

I also simulated the circuit in Proteus and that seems to give 150kHz as well, so that probably means its something to do with the components I'm assuming?

Thanks rude man for the explanation, I think I may suggest a redesign as part of my work!
11si71d.jpg
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K