Amplitude and Velocity Relationship in Violin Playing

AI Thread Summary
In violin playing, drawing the bow faster does not necessarily increase the energy transferred to the string, which affects sound volume. The amplitude of the wave can increase with greater bow pressure, leading to a louder sound, but not solely due to bow speed. The velocity of the wave along the string is determined by the string's material and is not influenced by the bow's speed. The discussion emphasizes that the relationship between bow speed and sound production is complex, with static friction playing a key role in string oscillation. Ultimately, faster bowing does not equate to increased energy or volume without additional pressure.
barcat
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I have already posted (at school) my answer to this one, but the more I think about it, the more I'm confused.

The question is "When playing a violin, the effect produced when the bow is drawn faster across the string is;
a. A higher pitch.
b. greater wave velocity in the string.
c. a louder sound.
d. all of these.
e. none of these... no discernable effect.

My answer was C. I believe the the faster the bow is drawn across the string will increase the amplitude of the wave thereby increasing it's volume.
B is giving me some difficulty. If the amplitude of the wave/string is increased, would'nt the velocity of the string have to increase in order to have the same Hz with a greater distance Peak to Peak?

Anyone have any suggestions?
barry
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the wavelength is determined by the length of the string.

And the velocity of the wave is determined by the material of the string. If you have any doubts about this, consider that you can shout faster, harder, higher, lower, whatever, nothing you do will change the speed with which your voice travels through the air at a given temperature and pressure.

So that eliminates a, b and d.

To produce a louder sound, you would have to supply more energy to the string. I don't think moving the bow more quickly across the string supplies MORE energy. It seems to me that the faster bow supplies the same amount of energy, but in a shorter period of time. So, if the velocity and frequency are the same, and the amount of energy is the same, why would the sound be louder? (On the other hand, pressing harder with the bow would transfer more energy, and therefore would produce a louder sound.)

I'm not certain about this, but I would answer e: no effect.
 
Maybe I am mistaken, I thought that by drawing the bow faster was adding energy to the wave, thereby increasing the amplitude. If the amplitude of the wave is increases doesn't the volume of the sound increase?

I'm still questioning answer b because I read it not to ask if the wave (sound speed) is increased, but if the back and forth velocity of the string itself is increased. Same Hz, same speed of the sound traveling from the string, but the string simply has travel faster if the Peak to Peak distance (amplitude) is increased in the sine wave at the same HZ? It is how they worded the answer that is killing me.




barry
 
the string simply has travel faster
The string isn't going anyplace (unless the violinist goes ballistic).

All kidding aside, there is no "other" velocity. The velocity of the wave IS the speed with which the sound travels along the string. I'm not sure what you have in mind when you say the "back and forth" motion of the string. It sounds like you are talking about the linear velocities of the vibrating molecules, but that's just another way of describing the frequency. It's not a third kind of movement.

You're right that increasing the amplitude would increase the volume. You may be correct, but I don't think that moving the bow faster increases the energy. I think that if there is a single stroke of the bow, with a given amount of pressure, the same amount of energy is transferred whether it takes 2 seconds or 1/4 second to complete the stroke.
 
If it helps any, the mechanism for bow-induced string oscillation is a stick-slip phenomenon, meaning it is largely characterized by static friction between the bow hairs and the surface of the string. The string is carried by the bow until the component of string tension along the bow is greater than the maximum static friction value, at which point string and bow slide relative to each other. It is then "caught" by static friction again and the cycle repeats. The point at which the static friction is reached at every one of these cycles is determined by the geormetry of the configuration (you can assume a constant string tension and resolve into components in a stretched position, or you could include string elasticity if you want to make the model more complicated). The amplitude of the string oscillations should, therefore, be unaffected by the bow speed (but they would be affected by bow pressure --> increased static friction).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top