An easy electrodynamics question, and yet

  • Thread starter Thread starter swindhspectrum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrodynamics
swindhspectrum
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
My first homework assignment for griffiths is underway.
Here is a problem I can't figure out.

Q. Two identical conducting small spheres are placed with their centers
0.350 meters apart. One is given a charge of 12.0 nC and the other
is given a charge of 16.0 nC The spheres are connected by a
conducting wire. Find the electric force between the two after
equilibrium has occurred.

A. I used Coulombs Law to arrive at .000014 N. This is incorrect. My reasoning was that the conducting wire would allow electrons to redistribute themselves giving the two spheres the same charge which is the average of the two initial charges. I must not understand the concept of equilibrium correctly. I would ask the instructor but the faculty at my institution is on strike presently!

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, even given your assumption (which feels right to me), I don't get the same answer as you do - I'm different by some exponent of 10. Are you certain about your answer?

Also, I think there should be 3 significant digits in your answer.
 
You were right in that it was a problem with the number of significant digits used. The homework is submitted online and the site used is a bit touchy.
Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top