Practical Ways to Lose Weight: The Power of Metabolizing Fat and Exercise

  • Thread starter Thread starter cy19861126
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
Energy is measured in calories and joules, with 1 gram of fat releasing 9.00 kcal. A student plans to lose weight by running up and down a flight of stairs, which involves calculating the work done against gravity. The correct formula for work is W = mgh, leading to an energy expenditure of 5880 J per flight of stairs. Considering human muscle efficiency at 20%, the total energy required to climb one flight becomes 29400 J. Ultimately, the student must climb approximately 583 flights of stairs to lose 1 lb of fat, a figure deemed realistic after adjustments for efficiency.
cy19861126
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Energy is conventionally measured in Calories as well as in joules. One Calorie in nutrition is one kilocalorie, defined as 1 kcal = 4186 J. Metabolizing 1 g of fat can release 9.00 kcal. A student decides to try to lose weight by exercising. She plans to run up and down the stairs in a football stadium as fast as she can and as many times as necessary. Is this in itself a practical way to lose weight? To evaluate the program, suppose she runs up a flight of 80 steps, each 0.150 m high, in 65 s. For simplicity, ignore the energy she uses in coming down (which is small). Assume that a typical efficiency for human muscles is 20.0%. Therefore when your body converts 100 J from metabolizing fat, 20 J goes into doing mechanical work (here, climbing stairs). The remainder goes into extra internal energy. Assume that the student's mass is 50.0 kg. How many times must she run the flight of stairs to lose 1 lb of fat

I got an answer for this question, but the number is too large, so I thought I may have gotten something wrong in my calculation:

okie, so if 1 g of fat can release 9.00 kcal, then 1lb of fat can release 17124545 J.

0.5mv^2 + W = mgh

However, to get the initial velocity (v):
Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ax
0 = Vi^2 + 2 * -9.8 * (0.15 * 80)
Vi = 15.3m/s

Plug it back in:
0.5 * 50 * 15.3^2 + W = 50 * 9.8 * (0.15 * 80)
W = 27.8 J

However, since human is 20% efficiency...
27.8 J * .2 = 5.6J

So running 80 set of stairs will let you lose 5.6 J of fat. So to lose 1lb of fat:
17124545J/5.6J = 3057954

To lose 1 lb of fat, you need to run the 80 stairs 3057954 times! For some reason, I think this value is too large. Anyone caught a mistake on my calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinetic energy should not be a factor in this problem. The student has to do a certain amount of work to climb the fight of stairs, and when the 20% efficiency is included, the energy expended to do that work will be 5 times the work accomplished. Your calculation of the amount of work to climb one flight of stairs is far less than the work output needed to accomplish that task, and on top of that you have inverted the effect of efficiency in the calculation. It takes more energy than the work accomplished, not less.
 
OlderDan said:
Kinetic energy should not be a factor in this problem. The student has to do a certain amount of work to climb the fight of stairs, and when the 20% efficiency is included, the energy expended to do that work will be 5 times the work accomplished. Your calculation of the amount of work to climb one flight of stairs is far less than the work output needed to accomplish that task, and on top of that you have inverted the effect of efficiency in the calculation. It takes more energy than the work accomplished, not less.
So are you saying the student does not move initially... then my equation will be W = mgh?
 
cy19861126 said:
So are you saying the student does not move initially... then my equation will be W = mgh?
The starting and stopping of the student is of little consequence. It is in fact a smaller effect than descending the stairs, which is being ignored in the problem. So yes, W = mgh for each climb of the stairs.
 
OlderDan said:
The starting and stopping of the student is of little consequence. It is in fact a smaller effect than descending the stairs, which is being ignored in the problem. So yes, W = mgh for each climb of the stairs.
Thank you very much. I thought that as you are climbing the stairs, you need initial velocity, so I'm having the wrong concept here. I was thinking more of motions. So here we go again:
W = mgh
= 50 * 9.8 * (0.15 * 80)
= 5880 J
Therefore, 5880 * 100%/20% = 29400J
Then the final answer should be: 17124545 / 29400 = 583

So the student must climb 583 flight of stairs to lose 1 lb of fat. Sounds realistic! Thanks. Can you please check if I did anything wrong here?
 
cy19861126 said:
Thank you very much. I thought that as you are climbing the stairs, you need initial velocity, so I'm having the wrong concept here. I was thinking more of motions. So here we go again:
W = mgh
= 50 * 9.8 * (0.15 * 80)
= 5880 J
Therefore, 5880 * 100%/20% = 29400J
Then the final answer should be: 17124545 / 29400 = 583

So the student must climb 583 flight of stairs to lose 1 lb of fat. Sounds realistic! Thanks. Can you please check if I did anything wrong here?
That looks OK. There will be a bit more work needed the first few steps to get up to speed, but that is offset by having to do a bit less work at the top couple of steps because of the momentum that is being carried. Because of the inefficiency factor, you could include startup work to build kinetic energy the first few steps as some extra energy being burned, but assuming the stairs are at a 45° angle the kinetic energy is only about 35 J. (Except for the 45° assumption, this is what you were calculatiing in your first attempt.) As you can see, this is very small compared to the mgh work, but it would save a few trips up those stairs.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top