An error related with matrix exponential

umut_caglar
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi guys I have a problem in finding my error in a calculation, I will be glad if you help me to find the error that I am doing

ok the problem is basically about matrix exponentials, here we go:

A, B, U, P are matrices
n is a natural number
t and T are rational numbers and T=n*t

now in general ## e^{t(A+B)}≠e^{tA}*e^{tB} ##
but can be represented by using The Zassenhaus formula

## e^{t(A+B)}=e^{tA}*e^{tB}*e^{(t^2/2)*(AB-BA)}*\ldots ##

one can find the details of the formula from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff_formula

now I begin by writing the formula

## e^{t(A+B)}=e^{tA}*e^{tB}*e^{(t^2/2)*(AB-BA)}*\ldots ##

and then I take the 'n'th power of both sides

## \left(e^{t(A+B)}\right)^n=\left(e^{tA}*e^{tB}*e^{(t^2/2)*(AB-BA)}*\ldots\right)^n ##if I define U=A+B I will get

## \left(e^{t U}\right)^n=\left(e^{tA}*e^{tB}*e^{(t^2/2)*(AB-BA)}*\ldots\right)^n ##

by using the equality of (e^A)^n=e^[aN] i will obtain

## e^{t*n*U}=\left(e^{tA}*e^{tB}*e^{(t^2/2)*(AB-BA)}*\ldots\right)^n ##

by using the definitions T=nt and U=A+B i will get

## e^{T*(A+B)}=\left(e^{tA}*e^{tB}*e^{(t^2/2)*(AB-BA)}*\ldots\right)^n ##

for the right side I define the P matrix as P=AB-BA

## e^{T*(A+B)}=\left(e^{tA}*e^{tB}*e^{(t^2/2)*P}*\ldots\right)^n ##

and by using the equality ## \left(e^A*e^B\right)^n=e^{(nA)}*e^{(nB)} ## recursively, I obtain

## e^{T*(A+B)}=e^{t*n*A}*e^{t*n*B}*e^{(t^2/2)*n*P}*\ldots ##

Again by using the definitions of T=tn and P=AB-BA I obtain

## e^{T*(A+B)}=e^{T*A}*e^{T*B}*e^{T*(t/2)*(AB-BA)}*\ldots ##

but, if expand the left side of the equation by using Zassenhaus formula, I end up with

## e^{TA}*e^{TB}*e^{(T^2/2)(AB-BA)}*...≠e^{TA}*e^{TB}*e^{(T*t/2)(AB-BA)}*\ldots ##which is not clearly equal to the right side; so where is my mistake.*****************************

As a side note; If you also show the correct version of the calculation I will be glad;

For example; I expect my error is asuuming the equality of ## \left(e^A*e^B\right)^n=e^{(nA)}*e^{(nB)} ##
if this is the mistake, could you show the correct relation?

Thanks for the help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit: You got the LaTex working, so I'll delete my version of it.

Another suggestion: You might get an answer quicker if you request this thread be moved to the Linear and Abstract Algebra section of the forum. I don't really know the proper way to make such a request. I suppose you could PM a moderator. The "report" feature might also be used, but the directions for using it make it sound like it's only to report offensive material.
 
Last edited:
Hi everybody I finally understand the problem, I will put a note to here in case someone else might need it

A and B are matrices n is a natural number

say ##AB-BA=\phi## then we will have ##(AB)^2=ABAB## which is equal to

##A(AB-\phi)B##

then we get

##=AABB-A\phi B##

finally get

##(AB)^2=A^2B^2-A\phi B##

so my initial guess was correct and ##(AB)^n≠A^nB^n##

thanks to everybody who tries to solve it
 
\left(e^A*e^B\right)^n=e^{(nA)}*e^{(nB)}

Yep, this is only true if A and B commute, that is AB-BA=0
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Another suggestion: You might get an answer quicker if you request this thread be moved to the Linear and Abstract Algebra section of the forum.
Done.
Stephen Tashi said:
I don't really know the proper way to make such a request. I suppose you could PM a moderator. The "report" feature might also be used, but the directions for using it make it sound like it's only to report offensive material.
No, it's fine to use the Report button for things like this, despite the misleading directions.
 
As a sidebar, it is important to know (at least when finding the root of a transition matrix) that if A= P'EP and B =R'SR where E and S are a diagonal matrix of eigenvalues. The P and R matrices are composed of the respective eigenvectors, and PP' = RR' = I. Then:

A^n = P'(E^n)P and B^n = R'(S^n)R

Note, A*A = P'(E)PP'(E)P = P'(E)I(E)P = P'(E^2)P

so one only needs to raise the diagonal elements (the eigenvalues) to the power of n (where n can also be a fraction, that is, taking a root).

As such, (A^n)*(B^n) = P'(E^n)P*R'(S^n)R
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top