An example of moving towards a light source

atomqwerty
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've a question that I'll illustrate by presenting the following example:

Let's imagine Einstein in a car that's moving away from a clock. This clock 'send' a light beam with the information 'It's 12 o'clock'. If the velocity of this car is close to c, I understand that Einstein will be driving beside the light beam, therefore beside the information, always seeing that the time is 12 o'clock, no changes. But, and this is my question, if Einstein drives towards the clock (close to c, too), will he see the events accelerated on the reference system of the clock (-earth)? why? I mean, einstein's only moving to the light: the only thing that he'll notice is that the information of '12 o'clock' will arrive earlier to his eyes...

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi atomqwerty, welcome to PF!

What you're describing is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect" . You see the clock faster or slower, depending on direction.
Only after you correct for the light travel times, you conclude that the clock ticks slower from your perspective. This is time dilation, and independent of direction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you, Ich :)
You mentioned the Doppler effect and if that effect only implies a change of the wavelenght that comes from a source of light (em field) or sound, would you see, for example, that the red color of a traffic light has turned into a green light if you'd drive at a huge speed?
 
would you see, for example, that the red color of a traffic light has turned into a green light if you'd drive at a huge speed?
Yes.
Actually, that was an exercise in my relativity textbook in school. The driver got away without a ticket, IIRC.
 
Ich said:
Yes.
The driver got away without a ticket
.(for ignoring lights) but got a huge one for speeding
 
thecritic said:
.(for ignoring lights) but got a huge one for speeding

Hahaha! :D
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top