An identity for functions of operators

Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
Is there an easy way to prove the identities:

e^{\hat{A}}e^{\hat{B}}=e^{\hat{A}+\hat{B}}e^{[\hat{A},\hat{B}]/2} and

e^{\hat{A}}\hat{B}e^{-\hat{A}}=\hat{B}+[\hat{A},\hat{B}]+\frac{1}{2!}[\hat{A},[\hat{A},\hat{B}]]+\frac{1}{3!}[\hat{A},[\hat{A},[\hat{A},\hat{B}]]]+...In Zettili they give that: e^{\hat{A}}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}\hat{A}^n

But I have no idea how I would expand a product of series to prove the identity... the algebra is horrible. Is there an easier way to go about proving it?
Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first equation is, for general A,B, wrong.

As for the second one set

f(t)=e^{At}Be^{-At}

calculate derivatives f^{(n)}(0) (calculate first three, and you will see how it goes), and then use Taylor's expansion:

f(1)=f(0)+f'(0)+\frac{1}{2!}f''(0)+...
 
Thanks :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top