An initial to general state problem (QM Help)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the state \(\left|\psi_t\right>\) of a three-level quantum system governed by a specified Hamiltonian. The initial state is given as \(\left|\psi_0\right> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1\\1\\0\end{array}\right)\). The participant correctly identifies the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian as \(E_n = 0, 3, 6\) and derives the unnormalized eigenvectors, later normalizing them. The approach involves expressing the initial state as a linear combination of the normalized eigenvectors and applying the time evolution factor \(e^{-i E_n t}\) for \(t > 0\). The participant confirms their understanding of the procedure, indicating they are on the right track.
Brad_Ad23
Messages
497
Reaction score
1
1. A 3 level system starts at time t = 0 in the state

\left|\psi_0\right> = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left(\begin{array}{cc}1\\1\\0\end{array}\right)

The Hamiltonian is H = 3\left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&0&0\\0&1&1\\0&1&1\end{array}\right)

If \hbar = 1
find the state \left|\psi_t\right> of the system for any time t > 0.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


It has been quite a few years since I've done this sort of thing. My approach, perhaps naively, was first to find the eigenvalues for H and then attempt to construct eigenvectors.
I wound up with E_n = 0, 3, 6 for eigenvalues and eigenvectors [un-normalized?] of

<br /> \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\1\\-1\end{array}\right) , \left(\begin{array}{c}1\\0\\0\end{array}\right) , \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\1\\1\end{array}\right)

I am a bit suspicious of the 2nd one, and at any rate I can't seem to remember what happens next (assuming this is the proper approach). I think the eigenvectors should be normalized and then the initial state written as a linear combo of the eigenvectors, with the finale being to add on the basic time-dependence factor of e^{-i E_n t} since h-bar is set to 1 here. Am I on the right approach? If I am or if I am not further help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, working on it a bit more I think I figured it out (amazing what taking a break for dinner may do).

So I have the unnormalized eigenvectors. If I normalize them I should wind up with:

<br /> \left|s_1\right&gt; = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\1\\-1\end{array}\right)
<br /> \left|s_2\right&gt; = \left(\begin{array}{c}1\\0\\0\end{array}\right)
<br /> \left|s_3\right&gt; = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\1\\1\end{array}\right)

So \left|\psi_0\right&gt; = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\left|s_2\right&gt; + \frac{1}{2}\left(\left|s_1\right&gt; + \left|s_3\right&gt;\right) = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\1\\0\end{array}\right)<br />

And then to get the general one for some t > 0, I should just put the appropriate exp(iEnt) in front of each eigenvector yes?
 
Brad_Ad23 said:
Ok, working on it a bit more I think I figured it out (amazing what taking a break for dinner may do).

So I have the unnormalized eigenvectors. If I normalize them I should wind up with:

<br /> \left|s_1\right&gt; = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\1\\-1\end{array}\right)
<br /> \left|s_2\right&gt; = \left(\begin{array}{c}1\\0\\0\end{array}\right)
<br /> \left|s_3\right&gt; = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\1\\1\end{array}\right)

So \left|\psi_0\right&gt; = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\left|s_2\right&gt; + \frac{1}{2}\left(\left|s_1\right&gt; + \left|s_3\right&gt;\right) = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\1\\0\end{array}\right)<br />

And then to get the general one for some t > 0, I should just put the appropriate exp(iEnt) in front of each eigenvector yes?

looks perfect to me:cool:
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top