An iPod probability question

  • Thread starter Thread starter darstephens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
darstephens
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
As a new joiner – and not too bright in Maths – I would like some help with the following questions:

The scenario:
Boy A has an iPod Classic with a shuffle facility. The iPod contains 5466 songs and 153 (2.8%) of them are by The Smiths and 198 (3.6%) by Morrissey.

Everyone morning, he uses the shuffle facility. This morning, out of the first 10 songs, 3 of them are either by The Smiths or by Morrissey.

The question:
What is the probability of any 3 songs by The Smiths and / or Morrissey coming in any shuffle selection of 10?

The assumption:
Please assume that the same song from the same album can't be repeated in the same shuffle selection.

The follow-up questions:

Does it matter whether they come 1st, 6th and 9th or 2nd, 4th and 10th?

What are the chances that they come 1st, 2nd and 3rd?
What are the odds that song #11 is also by The Smiths or by Morrissey?


A simple response showing the method of calculation and the result(s) would help me sleep tonight!

Kind Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are 198 + 153 = 351 songs from the two groups, and 5466 - 351 = 5115 other songs. Thus there are 351 * 350 * 349 * 5115 * 5114 * 5113 * 5112 * 5111 * 5110 * 5109 ways to choose the songs as first, second, and third (and not as fourth, ..., tenth).

Divide by the number of ways to choose any 10 songs in order and you have the answer to the second follow-up.

Now this allows only one order, but how many orders are there? How many ways to arrange three items in ten slots? Multiply by this amount to answer the main question.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top