An object travelling away from earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mu naught
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
AI Thread Summary
An object shot away from Earth experiences changing gravitational acceleration, complicating the calculation of when its velocity will reach zero. The motion can be described using conic sections, with specific orbital energy being conserved. If the object is in a bound elliptical orbit, its velocity will be zero at the apogee, where the distances relate to the orbit's size. For a rectilinear trajectory, the apogee can be calculated using the energy equation. Calculating the time for the object to reach zero velocity involves complex calculus and may not have a straightforward analytical solution.
Mu naught
Messages
208
Reaction score
2
Say I have an object which has been shot away from Earth at some initial velocity, and I want to find out how long it will take until it's velocity is zero.

If it is moving fast enough, the approximation v = v0 + aΔt doesn't work because the acceleration due to gravity is changing as a function of r. I want to describe v as a function of t, set v equal to zero and solve for t.

This is the attempt I have made to solve this:

[PLAIN]http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/2879/problemw.png

Any suggestions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Free falling objects in a central gravity field follow an orbit with can be described as a conic section (ellipse, parabola, hyperbola) and you can then relate the distance and speed of the object at any given time to the size of that conical section, a by observing that the specific orbital energy (equal to the total mechanical energy per mass E) of the object is conserved as

(1) \frac{1}{2}v^2 - \frac{\mu}{r} = E = -\frac{\mu}{2a}

where \mu = GM_{earth}. If E < 0 the orbit is a bound elliptical orbit and the object will have zero radial speed at farthest point in orbit, called apogee r_a and at its closest point, called perigee r_p, and those two distances are related to the size of the orbit by 2a = r_a + r_p.

It is not clear from your description if you want to shoot the object straight away from the Earth in a recti-linear orbit (i.e. "straight up") where perigee approaches zero or if the object is in a more realistic orbit (inserted from low Earth parking orbit) where perigee is close to the initial distance, but if we assume the last (that is, r = r_p) then you can insert this into (1) and solve to get

(2) r_a = -\frac{\mu}{E} - r

If you really do mean a recti-linear orbit then inserting r_p = 0 gives

(3) r_a = -\frac{\mu}{E}

Hope this helps, otherwise feel free to ask. By the way, the subject is very standard and it should be easy to find a more detailed explanation for two-body motion problems in a great number of physical textbooks and on the net.
 
The answer for distances is a fairly simple polar equation describing a conic section (Circle, ellipse, parabola or hyperbola). That way you can tell the distance of an object in orbit (Either open or close) as a function of the angle relative to the major axis of the curve.The question of time in orbit, however, is a very different, and much more difficult one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_fall#Inverse-square_law_gravitational_field

It requires quite a bit of knowledge in calculus, and I'm not sure if an analytical solution in elementary functions exists for the case of non-zero initial tangential velocity.

If you know the separation at 0 velocity (Readily available from the energy equation U/m=-\frac{GM}{y_0}+\tfrac{1}{2}v^2=-\frac{GM}{r_f}, setting v to 0 to find the distance at which the velocity is 0) then you can calculate the time for the separation to reach that final value starting with an initial separation y_0=R_{earth}
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top