Analysis 2- upper/lower integral vs integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter perlawin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Integral
perlawin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. True or false (show work): For all bounded functions:
(L) ∫_a^b▒f(x)dx≤∫_a^b▒f(x)dx≤(U)∫_a^b▒f(x)dx



2. (L) ∫_a^b▒f(x)dx= sup{L(f,P) s.t P is a partition of [a,b]}
(U)∫_a^b▒f(x)dx= inf{U(f,P) s.t. P is a partition of [a,b]}




3. I am sure that this is true. What I want to do is prove it by induction. Specifically, prove that the first inequality holds and then show that the second one does. I have drawn pictures representing a base case (how the lower integral is less than the regular one), and I have pictures that illustrate how the amount of area increases but is never exact. How do I actually write it out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you are inducting on, as I don't see any natural numbers in the problem. However, those inequalities should follow from the basic definitions that you've already listed in the relevant equations section.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top