Analysis: What does Sqrt(n^2+2n)-n converge to?Prove it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chinnu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Chinnu
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Formulate a conjecture about the convergence or divergence of the sequence:

\sqrt{n^{2}+2n} - n

Homework Equations



Triangle Inequality, etc...

The Attempt at a Solution



Start by noticing that (n+1)^{2} = (n^{2}+2n+1), so, (n+1) = \sqrt{n^{2}+2n+1}

Now, \sqrt{n^{2}+2n} - n < |\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}-(n+1)|

Multiply the RHS by 1 in the following manner:

|\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}-(n+1)| * \frac{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n+1}+\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}}{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n+1}+\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}}

= \frac{n^{2}+2n+1-n^{2}-2n}{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}+(n+1)}

= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}+(n+1)}

Now, by observation,

\frac{1}{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}+(n+1)} < \frac{1}{n}

we know \forall\epsilon>0 \exists N\in N \ni n \geq N => \frac{1}{n} < \epsilon

I'm not sure what to do now...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Chinnu said:

Homework Statement



Formulate a conjecture about the convergence or divergence of the sequence:

\sqrt{n^{2}+2n} - n

Homework Equations



Triangle Inequality, etc...

The Attempt at a Solution



Start by noticing that (n+1)^{2} = (n^{2}+2n+1), so, (n+1) = \sqrt{n^{2}+2n+1}[\itex]<br /> <br /> Now, \sqrt{n^{2}+2n} - n &amp;lt; |\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}-(n+1)|[\itex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Multiply the RHS by 1 in the following manner:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; |\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}-(n+1)| x \frac{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n+1}+\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}}{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n+1}+\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}}[\itex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; = \frac{n^{2}+2n+1-n^{2}-2n}{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}+(n+1)}[\itex]&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}+(n+1)}[\itex]&amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; Now, by observation, &amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; \frac{1}{\sqrt{n^{2}+2n}+(n+1)} &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt; \frac{1}{n}[\itex]&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; we know \forall\epsilon&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;0 \existsN\inN \ni n \geq N =&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; \frac{1}{n} &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt; \epsilon[\itex]&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; I&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#039;m not sure what to do now...
&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Also, could someone tell me why the latex formating didn&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#039;t work in the above post...
 
Chinnu said:
Also, could someone tell me why the latex formating didn't work in the above post...

Yes,

You terminated them with a backslash [\itex] rather than a slash [/itex] .
 
And I think you want to multiply numerator and denominator by the 'conjugate' sqrt(n^2+2n)+n. Then think about the limit.
 
SammyS said:
Yes,

You terminated them with a backslash [\itex] rather than a slash [/itex] .

You may want to Edit you Original Post.

lol, stupid mistake,

Thank you
 
Chinnu said:
lol, stupid mistake,

Thank you
A mistake... NOT a stupid mistake.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top