Analytical solutions of S.E. for unusual potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving analytical solutions for the Schrödinger equation (S.E.) under a piecewise potential defined as V(x)=0 for x<0, V(x)=V_0 for 0≤x≤a, and V(x)=∞ for x>a. The solutions for each region are established as psi_I(x) = A*exp(-ikx) + B*exp(ikx) for region I, psi_II(x) = C*exp(-iqx) + D*exp(iqx) for region II, and psi_III(x) = 0 for region III. Boundary conditions are applied to connect the solutions across regions, leading to the relations A+B=C+D and k(-A+B)=q(-C+D). The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying boundary conditions to avoid misinterpretations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and the Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems in physics
  • Knowledge of complex exponentials and their properties
  • Basic concepts of piecewise functions and potential energy profiles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of infinite potential wells in quantum systems
  • Explore the mathematical properties of complex exponentials in wave functions
  • Investigate the continuity conditions for wave functions across potential boundaries
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working on wave functions, and anyone interested in solving boundary value problems related to the Schrödinger equation.

DevoBoy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Analytical solutions of S.E. for "unusual" potential

Hi,

Given the potential

V(x)=0, when x<0 (region I)
V(x)=V_0, when 0<=x<=a, V_0=real constant (region II)
V(x)=infinite when x>a (region III)

What would be the general form on the solutions for each region?

I would think the solution for region I would be on the form A*exp(ikx) rather than A*exp(ikx)+B*exp(-ikx), since the exp(-ikx) term would "blow up" when x -> -infinite ?? But in the problem text I'm asked later "name the coefficient for the right-moving term A, and the left-moving term B", implying that I should use two terms for the solution ... ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DevoBoy said:
Given the potential

V(x)=0, when x<0 (region I)
V(x)=V_0, when 0<=x<=a, V_0=real constant (region II)
V(x)=infinite when x>a (region III)

I would think the solution for region I would be on the form A*exp(ikx) rather than A*exp(ikx)+B*exp(-ikx), since the exp(-ikx) term would "blow up" when x -> -infinite ??

No term would "blow up" in the I region simply because both the sine and the cosine are bounded functions.
 
Last edited:
DevoBoy said:
since the exp(-ikx) term would "blow up" when x -> -infinite ??

e^{ikx} and e^{-ikx} both oscillate. Their magnitude (absolute value) never gets larger than 1.
 
Ofcourse, my mistake.

So I end up with solutions:

psi_I(x) = A*exp(-ikx) + B*exp(ikx)
psi_II(x) = C*exp(-iqx) + D*exp(iqx)
psi_III(x) = 0

with boundary conditions

psi_I(0) = psi_II(0)
(d/dx)psi_I(0) = (d/dx)psi_II(0)
psi_II(a) = 0 (loss of continuinity here, right?)

Which gives the relations:

A+B=C+D
k(-A+B)=q(-C+D)
C*exp(-iqa)+D*exp(iqa)=0

Somehow I suspect I've missed something. A possibility of eliminating the exponentials in that last formula, or missed a boundary condition, or ... ?
 
Devoboy,

I assume you know that

exp(ia) = cos(a) + isin(a)

.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K