Analytical solutions of S.E. for unusual potential

DevoBoy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Analytical solutions of S.E. for "unusual" potential

Hi,

Given the potential

V(x)=0, when x<0 (region I)
V(x)=V_0, when 0<=x<=a, V_0=real constant (region II)
V(x)=infinite when x>a (region III)

What would be the general form on the solutions for each region?

I would think the solution for region I would be on the form A*exp(ikx) rather than A*exp(ikx)+B*exp(-ikx), since the exp(-ikx) term would "blow up" when x -> -infinite ?? But in the problem text I'm asked later "name the coefficient for the right-moving term A, and the left-moving term B", implying that I should use two terms for the solution ... ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DevoBoy said:
Given the potential

V(x)=0, when x<0 (region I)
V(x)=V_0, when 0<=x<=a, V_0=real constant (region II)
V(x)=infinite when x>a (region III)

I would think the solution for region I would be on the form A*exp(ikx) rather than A*exp(ikx)+B*exp(-ikx), since the exp(-ikx) term would "blow up" when x -> -infinite ??

No term would "blow up" in the I region simply because both the sine and the cosine are bounded functions.
 
Last edited:
DevoBoy said:
since the exp(-ikx) term would "blow up" when x -> -infinite ??

e^{ikx} and e^{-ikx} both oscillate. Their magnitude (absolute value) never gets larger than 1.
 
Ofcourse, my mistake.

So I end up with solutions:

psi_I(x) = A*exp(-ikx) + B*exp(ikx)
psi_II(x) = C*exp(-iqx) + D*exp(iqx)
psi_III(x) = 0

with boundary conditions

psi_I(0) = psi_II(0)
(d/dx)psi_I(0) = (d/dx)psi_II(0)
psi_II(a) = 0 (loss of continuinity here, right?)

Which gives the relations:

A+B=C+D
k(-A+B)=q(-C+D)
C*exp(-iqa)+D*exp(iqa)=0

Somehow I suspect I've missed something. A possibility of eliminating the exponentials in that last formula, or missed a boundary condition, or ... ?
 
Devoboy,

I assume you know that

exp(ia) = cos(a) + isin(a)

.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
758
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top