Analyzing Cantilever Beam Bending: Is My Solution Accurate?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the accuracy of a solution for cantilever beam bending. The original poster is uncertain about part (a) due to a lack of recall of the relevant formula, while parts (b) and (c) have been confirmed as correct, though the z-direction deflection and rotation need to be computed. A correction was noted regarding a numerical error, and proper unit nomenclature was emphasized, suggesting the use of MPa instead of kPa. The total deflection formula was discussed, leading to questions about how to calculate resultant rotation, with a suggestion to report the individual components instead. The conversation highlights the importance of thoroughness in mechanical analysis and accurate unit usage.
temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



e42b7057-6171-49ad-84ae-f150edad9d4d.png


The Attempt at a Solution



5a85930c-7388-452c-bec6-6f658d3a488c.jpe


Is my work correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
temaire: I do not know if part (a) is correct, because I do not remember the formula. I will let someone else check part (a).

Your answer for part (b) currently looks correct. In part (c), you currently computed only the y-direction deflection and rotation, which are correct. But I think you now might also need to compute the z-direction deflection and rotation.

You accidentally typed 877, instead of 866, although you did not use it.

By the way, kN/m^2 is called kPa. Always use the correct, special name for a unit. E.g., 7214 kPa, not 7214 kN/m^2. However, it is better if you use 7.214 MPa, instead of 7214 kPa.
 
I've calculated the deflection and rotation of the beam in the z-direction.

I know that the total deflection of the beam is the resultant of the deflections in the y and z directions, as shown

\delta = \sqrt{u^2 + v^2}

where u is the deflection in the z-direction and v is the deflection in the y-direction.

However, how do I find the resultant rotation? Do I simply use the above formula and just switch u and v with the \theta_y and \theta_z?
 
temaire: Your resultant deflection looks great. Regarding the resultant rotation, we would need to think that over for awhile. I am not sure yet. However, would you settle for just stating the y and z components of rotation? You might not need to compute a resultant rotation. Just state the two components, theta_y and theta_z (?).
 
Yes, I am leaving my answer for rotation in terms of y and z.

Thanks for the replies.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top