Analyzing False Statements about Orbitals

  • Thread starter Thread starter a.a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbitals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying false statements regarding atomic orbitals. The user is uncertain about the validity of several claims, specifically regarding the orientations of p and d orbitals, and the energy levels of 3d and 4s orbitals in hydrogen and helium atoms. The user initially suspects statements b, c, and d to be false but later narrows it down to b and c. Clarification and verification of these statements are requested from other participants. Accurate understanding of orbital characteristics is essential for grasping quantum chemistry concepts.
a.a
Messages
126
Reaction score
0
I was able to work through most of them myself but am haveing problems with the following, for some I simply don't understand the statement it self. Any help appericiated.
Pick the false statements out of the following:


a. Different p orbitals with the same value of the principal quantum number have different orientations in space.
b. Only three different orientations are possible for 3d orbitals.
c. A dxy orbital has maximum electron density along the x and y axes directions.
d. For the hydrogen atom, a 3d orbital is of higher energy than a 4s orbital.
e. For helium atom, a 3d electron is of higher energy than a 3s electron.

I think b, c, and d are false, but am very unsure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just read-up on the topic a bit more, I now think that only b and c are false. Can someone pleasr verify?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top