Analyzing Friction in a Hanging Mass System

  • Thread starter Thread starter darkSun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass String
AI Thread Summary
A 5 kg mass hangs from a slack string between two poles, creating different angles due to friction at the hook. The tension in the string varies on either side of the mass, influenced by friction, which prevents the mass from sliding to the midpoint. The equations for tension components do not include friction directly, as they are used to analyze the system at rest. To find the force of friction, one must calculate the tensions and determine their difference, which reflects the frictional force. Understanding the relationship between tension and friction is crucial for solving this problem effectively.
darkSun
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass of 5 kg has a hook attached to it, and it is placed on an initially slack string that is suspended from two poles.

Due to friction between the rope and the hook, the mass does not slide to the middle of the two poles; it hangs closer to one side so that the string makes an angle of 50 degrees with the horizontal on that side, and 30 degrees with the other side.

Question is: What is the force of friction between the hook and the string?

Is this description clear enough?


Homework Equations


Is this correct? Friction between the string and the hook = (mu*Tension)


The Attempt at a Solution


The first thing I'm wondering is whether the tensions in the string on either sides of the mass will be the same. They are both the same string, but... I'm not sure.

Also, when separating tension into components, ie

T1sin 50 + T2 sin 30 = 5g
and
T1cos 50 = T2cos 30

T1 is the tension in the shorter side of the string, the side closer to the pole and inclined at a higher angle. T2 is the tension in the other side.
Would friction be included in these equations? I think so, and I think it would be along the same direction as T1. (so replace T1 by T1 + Friction)

But then I get two equations in three unknows, namely T1, T2, and Friction. I think I am going about this the wrong way...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't mention that the hook is cylindrical, but apparently that has a great deal to do with the problem.

Basically I have to find an expression for friction on a curved surface... I think that expression looks like e^(mu) or something similar (friends told me). Let's see if I can do that now!
 
darkSun said:

Homework Statement


A mass of 5 kg has a hook attached to it, and it is placed on an initially slack string that is suspended from two poles.

Due to friction between the rope and the hook, the mass does not slide to the middle of the two poles; it hangs closer to one side so that the string makes an angle of 50 degrees with the horizontal on that side, and 30 degrees with the other side.

Question is: What is the force of friction between the hook and the string?

Is this description clear enough?


Homework Equations


Is this correct? Friction between the string and the hook = (mu*Tension)
, no friction is a function of the normal bearing force between the hook and string. The lower tension, T2, must lie within the range of the higher tension,T1 (no friction) and T_1e^{u_sk}, but that equation is not needed in this problem.

The Attempt at a Solution


The first thing I'm wondering is whether the tensions in the string on either sides of the mass will be the same. They are both the same string, but... I'm not sure.
they are not the same; friction accounts for the difference. If they were the same, the hook would slide to the low point of the wire, and there would be no friction.
Also, when separating tension into components, ie

T1sin 50 + T2 sin 30 = 5g
and
T1cos 50 = T2cos 30

T1 is the tension in the shorter side of the string, the side closer to the pole and inclined at a higher angle. T2 is the tension in the other side.
yes
Would friction be included in these equations? I think so, and I think it would be along the same direction as T1. (so replace T1 by T1 + Friction)
the equations do not include friction which is internal to the system. T1 is T1 everywhere on the shorter side, and T2 is T2 everywhere on the longer side, regardless of whether the string is at the hook or away from it. Rather, the resulting tension differential is due to friction.
But then I get two equations in three unknows, namely T1, T2, and Friction. I think I am going about this the wrong way...
Calculate T1 and T2. They would be equal if there were no friction, and the hook would slide to the low point, but since there is friction which prevents that, the friction force must be________?
 
I see, so you would just solve for the tensions like in a problem without friction, and find the difference. That would be the friction.

I'll try to think about why the friction is not included in

T1sin 50 + T2 sin 30 = 5g
and
T1cos 50 = T2cos 30

..Oh, I think I just got it. These equations are used when the mass is at rest regardless of what friction or anything else is acting, to find the tensions.

And also, could you give me a hint as to where that T1e^mu came from? That looks very interesting... and useful for the next part of the problem, which asks for the minimum coefficient of static friction that will allow the hook to sit there.

Thank you very much PhanthomJay!
 
I'm not much into the calculus, but for the derivation of T_2 = T_1e^{\mu\beta}, see
http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Physics/8-01TFall-2004/84DD1138-93A4-47E0-8F54-CB45EBE8351D/0/exp05b.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting link, I appreciate it PhanthomJay.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top